Champions League 2016/17

Trickykid

Active member
City is a bad pull as I see it, and Mönchengladbach could have much better too. I don't know how Celtic is nowadays, but it could obviously have been a lot worse.

All in all I'm just glad we're not going to Russia during the middle of the winter.
 

serghei

Senior Member
City and Atletico are the best 2nd seeds and Monchengladbach with Tottenham are the best 3rd seeds. But it is OK, this is CL groups.

Madrid has a tricky group as well. Dortmund and Sporting are also among the best teams in pot 2 and 3.
 

barcanuck

New member
Celtic will park the bus at home with a great crowd. Even if awful can pull something out of their hat, otherwise we just gotta school Bravo and Pep.
 

Albo

New member
Worried more about Mglad than City. Our players will be very motivated against Pep and Bravo, guessing an easy victory.
 

JamDav1982

Senior Member
City and Atletic are the best 2nd seeds and Monchengladbach with Tottenham are the best 3rd seeds. We got one of the top 2 teams in each 2 out of 3 pots. But it is OK, this is CL groups.

Madrid has a tricky group as well. Dortmund and Sporting are also among the best teams in pot 2 and 3.

Open to opinion. A lot of people rate the likes of BVB higher than City etc.

Not all that much in the third placed teams really.
 

bismp

Well-known member
It all depends on how good Pep will make City by that time.We will probably get the #1 position one way or another,but if City becomes 2008/09 Barca 2.0,then there will be a big battle for the first place.

"ok" group all in all.Could be better,but could also be worse IMO.

However,Uefa really need to shake things up a little bit.CHL gets more and more boring as we see the same fixtures all the time...Barca vs City,Chelsea vs PSG,Barca vs PSG,Barca vs Arsenal,Arsenal vs Bayern,Real vs BVB,Real vs Atletico etc
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top