Yannik
Senior Member
?
Only Man United, Real, Barca then City + PSG are 'richer'.
So are Milan, Liverpool, Arsenal, Tottenham, Everton and in the future also a ton of english clubs.
?
Only Man United, Real, Barca then City + PSG are 'richer'.
What is it now, 3 own goals in 2 matches? Barca doesnt even need to score goals to win anymore.
As a Real Madrid fan you should stay cool.
We are just smoke in the eyes, our possibility to win the CL is 0%.
So are Milan, Liverpool, Arsenal, Tottenham, Everton and in the future also a ton of english clubs.
Bayern are richer than all those clubs and only Arsenal comes close from that list.
Dude, Milan spent 180m on players thanks to their new sugardaddy.
Bayern's warchest is around 70m and they can spent it every 3 years.
All the clubs I mentioned spent more on transfers in the past 3 years than Bayern. Ever seen the TV money distribution in the top 5 leagues? Hell Sunderland earned more than Bayern and they were relegated. Gylfi-fuck-me-Sigurdsson would be Bayern's record transfer.
1 (3) Manchester United 689 (515.3) 519.5 (395.2)
2 (2) Barcelona 620.2 (463.8) 560.8 (426.6)
3 (1) Real Madrid 620.1 (463.8) 577 (439)
4 (5) Bayern Munich 592 (442.7) 474 (360.6)
5 (6) Manchester City 524.9 (392.6) 463.5 (352.6)
6 (4) Paris St-Germain 520.9 (389.6) 480.8 (365.8)
7 (7) Arsenal 468.5 (350.4) 435.5 (331.3)
8 (8) Chelsea 447.4 (334.6) 420 (319.5)
9 (9) Liverpool 403.8 (302) 391.8 (298.1)
10 (10) Juventus 341.1 (255.1) 323.9 (246.4)
I am unsure as to what these numbers mean. Anyway City, United and PSG are all apparently listed below Bayern there while MIlan is not even on it despite being ManCity type of rich, so I don't think that list - whatever it says - gives a great indicative on who is richer than whom.
revenue from each team per year
But that ignores costs and especially loans from third parties. It's not that easy. Bayern can't just pay 220m on a player like PSG does. Arguably not even half that.