Champions League 2024-25

[mc_lovin]

What is wrong with you Madritista cunt?

we say the simple obvious thing: this rule does not make any sense

Just keeping a clear head mate. Alvarez messed up. No one else to blame, really.

 

[FC B]

It's not a charity. There are rules, he messed up. No 2nd chances.

If that's all you understood from what I wrote that's it, don't have anything more to add.

 

[Givenchy]

Only one team can stop Madrid shithousing their way to another boring CL title.

 

[Loki]

Simeone is the most responsible for me. He doesn't learn and does it again and again and again. Defending a draw at home in front of this atmosphere with Alvarez and Griezmann in attack.
About time that we trash them really good on sunday.

 

[Barcaman]

Same polish cunt that is a RM fan and is in the locker-room wearing RM accessories

Yeah, makes sense.

I was stupid to tune in for penalties thinking there can't be robbery there.

 

[Iniesta Ultra]

It's not two touches. It's one action as the initial foot is still touching the ball when the second foot hits it.

who are you trolling

 

[Birdy]

Only one team can stop Madrid shithousing their way to another boring CL title.

They are not getting past Arsenal.
Arteta ain't Simeone

 

[Andresito]

The question is going to be if Courtois was off his line does that invalidate the miss? Or does it literally have to be saved?

Because those things are clearly not independent, it would be weird if the goalkeeper's infringement wasn't considered.

Which Offense Takes Priority?

When both the taker and the goalkeeper commit an offense:

If the taker's infraction happens first (like a double touch), then the penalty is not retaken. Instead, the shot is just recorded as a miss.

If the goalkeeper’s infraction affects the outcome (e.g., they save the shot while being off the line), then the kick is retaken.


Since a double touch happens before the goalkeeper could make a save, the taker's mistake would be the dominant offense, and the shot would be recorded as a miss—no retake is given.

AI carrying

 

[serghei]

Scenes here. Get a grip guys...

A close close match and the more experienced team and the more lucky team got the spot in the quarters.

 

[Porque]

Which still makes it two touches

Nah. If the player is a knob and decides to run into his penalty, and front slide hitting the ball with both his feet. Coz ya know, he's a knob.

That would count as one fluid action and one touch.

 

[Messi983]

Nothing new, hope you guys didn't waste three hours of your lifes to watch this shite.

 

[Birdy]

Which Offense Takes Priority?

When both the taker and the goalkeeper commit an offense:

If the taker's infraction happens first (like a double touch), then the penalty is not retaken. Instead, the shot is just recorded as a miss.

If the goalkeeper’s infraction affects the outcome (e.g., they save the shot while being off the line), then the kick is retaken.


Since a double touch happens before the goalkeeper could make a save, the taker's mistake would be the dominant offense, and the shot would be recorded as a miss—no retake is given.

AI carrying

WOW

Total double-standards

Who TF wrote this clause?

 

[JamDav1982]

Keeper being off line doesnt matter unless he saves it.

Even if Alavrez missed the target it wont matter Courtois off his line there unless to blatant an attempt to put off opponent.

 

[te amo barca]

Embarassing meltdown here.

 

[mc_lovin]

If that's all you understood from what I wrote that's it, don't have anything more to add.

You tried to create another grey area, which imo isn't needed. He tocuhed the ball twice. That's it.

More ambiguity is the last thing football needs.