So, when the managers you stan for don't win, you parade stats like xG to show why the result was 'unfair' to them and that they had outplayed their counterpart.
But when it's against your agenda, they become merely game summaries and stats.
How predictable.
But to humor you a little, just a couple of the basic tactics:
Look at how badly Kimmich got overrun by Vinicius just kicking the ball far out and making it a race/sprint. That was deliberate and Tuchel was either too clueless or too proud to fix it.
The midfield. Ancelotti's best teams are well known for crowding the midfield and using the midfield as a springboard. Tuchel went with 4 attackers and 2 midfielders (and 2 non-elite ones at that). And the wingers barely dropped in towards the middle.
Dude, you need some basic courses in Reading Comprehension 101
You have to learn how to read
1) I never said 'the results was unfair' Only the goal robbery was unfair
If you look at my first comment here after the game I said precisely that Bayern were bad tonight and Madrid better, it's one of the very few important CL qualification Madrid took while being better and not worse like last round or previous years
2) I asked you to explain how Ancelotti 'outplayed' Tuchel. That goes far beyond the mere general statement that Madrid were better.
3) Madrid have a much better squad than Bayern. This means that if they have similar level coaches Madrid always wins this. This means IN TURN that if Bayern were to win this Bayern's coach should certainly outplay somehow Madrid's coach and not the other way round
4) Ancelotti crowds the midfield with no plan whatsoever. There is some fuzzy vague thought behind it, but certainly not tactical instruction on the players in md what to do and how to execute a plan. If you watch the game again, and in fact game vs City, and CL Madrid games last season against City, Ancelotti's instruction on how to attack is fairly simplistic, and that was happening all the time yesterday: however has the ball tries to hit one towards the left for Vinicius and Rodrygo, with Belligham also going there, and HOPES that they will SOMEHOW combine on their INTUITIONS, if not Vinicius to do it all by himself
Sorry, that's not a tactical plan/
5) When Xavi doesn't have a plan how to break oppositions and instructs people to pass to Dembele so he can create on his own, we RIGHTFULLY criticize him. When Ancelotti does the same with Vinicius, you (all of Madrid stuns in here) praise him for some masterclass
6) Ancelotti himself said in the pre-match presser in Munich that he doesn't want to 'mess up' things with instructions, and he prefers the players to express themselves, something along these lines.
And you think he is top coach?
7) Again as I wrote in my post match comment, Tuchel lost the game, Ancelotti did not win it. He went for a cagey and passive plan that OBV didn't work out. This Madrid team is managed when pressed, not when sat back, we have seen it vs City all these years. The fact that Tuchel was close to qualification before Neuer's error does not mean he was right. The plan DID NOT work ,and the xG you cite is the proof for that
8) The point on Kimmich I agree with. I wrote it in my comment after the game. Tuchel in the 2nd half should have adjusted, his defence was leaking there. It is an instance of 7 above
ALL in ALL, then, no mate, Ancelotti did not do shit on Tuchel.
Tuchel outdid himself with a bad plan, and given that Madrid have 10 times better XI than Bayern's yesterday, it was really difficult for Madrid not to win
