snowy
Well-known member
I like Lamine and Musiala playwiseWho's better?
even at PSG, best 1v1 are Barcola and your fav bouze
also new talent poppin up soon ... there's got to
I like Lamine and Musiala playwiseWho's better?
Last time i remember that was with victor valdes
Why are you laughing? He usually played well in big games for barca, far more than ter stegen anyway
So far clearly Vinicius, despite being a disgusting cunt.
Mbape is all PR and disappearing act in crucial games. He gets easily blocked
Vinicius has always had a much better team. Elite GK that doesn't make dumb mistakes. Great defence. Elite midfield. Very good attack if not elite.
Meanwhile PSG have a GK who's worse than even ter Stegen under pressure. A defence that keep leaking. Very overrated midfield.
Similarly:
Vinicius has been dogshit for Brazil.
Mbappe has been godly for France.
He was an average keeper.
Vinicius has always had a much better team. Elite GK that doesn't make dumb mistakes. Great defence. Elite midfield. Very good attack if not elite.
Meanwhile PSG have a GK who's worse than even ter Stegen under pressure. A defence that keep leaking. Very overrated midfield.
Similarly:
Vinicius has been dogshit for Brazil.
Mbappe has been godly for France.
Valdes wasn't a great GK as he was wildly inconsistent and had some blunders in him, but we don't win in 2006 without him and he was good in the 2009 run as well.
I mean he did make some saves. But most of the time the other teams parked the bus against us.
I don't have the time to debate low iq this night. Re-watch 4 times the first 65 minutes, might help. Given the disparity in quality having real at your gun point might mean you won the game for an Iq over 80.Terzic won the game . How do you come up with this conclusion?