ZenI
Professor Balthazar
He dragged that leg intentionally to get a a pen, minimum like 7/10 VAR judges would NOT give it...
Champions League 23/24
- Thread starter Barcaman
- Start date
Birdy
Senior Member
It's exactly the same pattern with Elliot.
Elliot can very well follow the ball and change direction, but he opts to go for landing on the feet of AWB.
He isn't tripped, he trips himself on a feet that is on the ground.
Unacceptable that the ref bites there
serghei
Senior Member
Not the same. Saka makes an extra step. Bissaka takes Eliott down very fast. He doesn't even get to plant his leg to switch direction.
Of course you say it wasn't a pen, you saw a super-slow-motion in which half a second is shown in 5 seconds as if that has any meaning whatsoever
.
Horatio
You're welcome
Remember raphinha not penalty given we discussed? Where raphinha took extra step different from natural run behind ball to make contact with opponent? You said it was penaltyNot the same. Saka makes an extra step. Bissaka takes Eliott down very fast. He doesn't even get to plant his leg to switch direction.
Of course you say it wasn't a pen, you saw a super-slow-motion in which half a second is shown in 5 seconds as if that has any meaning whatsoever
serghei
Senior Member
Raphinha vs Getafe I think. Remember it very well. Clear pen that one.
Even Spanish ref on Marca said it at the time.To each his own. For me, I made it very clear all the time that tripping an opponent is a pen. And any sliding tackle where you don't get the ball has very high chances of causing a pen by way of tripping the attacker in his normal chase of the ball.
It was Celta match.
Total-Football
Senior Member
How the fuck is that not a penalty lmao.. first angle is enough.. goalkeeper deliberately extended his leg
Edit : really tricky lmao ! Just noticed that both the keeper and saka had ill intentions hahahah
khaled_a_d
Senior Member
serghei
Senior Member
The angle is not good. You need an angle from the opposite side.
Horatio
You're welcome
Raphina is not running normalmpath. Can be seen if you watch the whole thing. Send me link.Clear pen this one.
Why it's a pen. Celta player doesn't get near the ball and extends his leg in Raphinha's normal running path who is in chasing the ball. Contact is made, penalty for tripping. Any other interpretation of a duel like this is not following the rules.
Btw saka wasnt penalty either
Birdy
Senior Member
Not the same. Saka makes an extra step. Bissaka takes Eliott down very fast. He doesn't even get to plant his leg to switch direction.
Of course you say it wasn't a pen, you saw a super-slow-motion in which half a second is shown in 5 seconds as if that has any meaning whatsoever
No, I saw it real time in w/o slow-motion and I thought from the very first moment that the ref messed up for calling this.
Same with Raphina dude
You have to understand: it's not about whether the defender slides or just extends a leg.
It's about who initiates the contact. The number one factor to determine whether to give any foul or not.
Slow-motion or real-time motion you can always tell who initiates it
Kul_z
Senior Member
Maybe you're right, but still think we are far away from showing our true level and in this tie we might show that we aint fucking around. Raphinha lewa lamine attack have something that gave me belief that we are capable of taking the game to anyone. I believe that against qshit we might surprise everyone. Lets fucking go!
serghei
Senior Member
What do you mean he's not running normal path? You're joking
The defender's leg is so stretched out, it's cutting his ideal trajectory for the ball. Defender has no intention of playing the ball, clear penalty.
¡A Raphinha no le pitan un penalti como una catedral!
Raphinha fue derribado por Galán en el Barcelona - Celta y el áribtro no señaló la pena máxima
www.sport.es
Home of Barca Fans
