Temptation
Well-known member
Maybe she just wanted to make out with him?
Even though we don't know, let's say the woman followed him in there seeking out sex and then consented to begin with, if she withdraws consent at any moment and he continues, it's rape. Maybe that's what happened. Maybe he didn't like that and got aggressive and forced her.
That's just one possibility of how she can willingly enter the bathroom and rape still occurring.
I don't deny it's practically impossible to prove such a thing. Barely anything has been made public so I'm not sure why you're saying all they had was that she cried.Fair enough. But it's practically impossible to prove that in a court of law beyond a reasonably doubt. Unless of course the court is based in a country that is essentially a banana republic.
There was far more evidence in the Mendy case. Far more complainants. Far more witnesses. Far more length of time of alleged offending. Far more admitting to sexual activity. But he walked away.
All they had was the lady cried when she left the toilet. Literally millions of women this weekend are going to end up agreeing to sexual tryists which they immediately regret.
And apparently because Alves lied that means he is guilty. Nothing to do with him not wanting to admit to maybe consensual infidelity to the world and his wife who he didn't want to leave him.
I'm not saying he is innocent, mind you. I'm saying that they did not prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. Not even close. In most other countries he would have walked.
Can you link all these court records?According to court records, she felt disgusted by him on the dance floor. Shortly thereafter, she followed him to the bathroom. Why would anyone follow a disgusting person anywhere?
The fact that he has now been released on bail mere weeks after the sentencing also implies that the case is even more ambiguous than previously thought.
Plenty of newspaper articles that have summarized the court testimonies.Can you link all these court records?
To cuddle on the disco's bathroom floor.Maybe she just wanted to make out with him?
How convenient for a slut.Even though we don't know, let's say the woman followed him in there seeking out sex and then consented to begin with, if she withdraws consent at any moment and he continues, it's rape. Maybe that's what happened. Maybe he didn't like that and got aggressive and forced her.
That's just one possibility of how she can willingly enter the bathroom and rape still occurring.
not the MSM?! Or is it ok in this instance I can't keep up.Plenty of newspaper articles that have summarized the court testimonies.
In fact, according to witness testimony, he not only placed her hand on his crotch, but also touched her p***y. She warned him to stop. Moments later, he gestured to her to join him passed an “unknown” door, to which she obliged.
Witnesses corner Dani Alves: He touched my p*ssy
On Friday afternoon, eight witnesses testified before the new judge Concepcion Canton in the Dani Alves case. The court received the testimonies of what happened on December 30...amp.marca.com
Which part would be convenient?How convenient for a slut.
I'm not talking about retracting consent after the fact. I'm talking mid intercourse.Willingly spreading your legs at random stranger and then retract your consent after the fact, because you got ashamed or wanted to dig some gold from a rich guy knowing full well that you can lie and laugh your way through the court in current wokeshit cesspool without ever being scrutinized or facing any punishment for slandering a man.