Joan
Well-known member
Did you see the video? The medical team said it was fine, he subbed him off vs Girona, didn't play vs. Las Palmas.Those of you defending Valverde, I ask again, how do you justify:
-Playing Pique through injury
Doctors gave Pique a green light, he himself wanted to play.
But: Pique's injury is Valverde's fault.
What had Dembele done so far to be an undisputable starter?-Playing Paulinho/Gomes/Vidal over Dembele
That aside, he has that "confidence issues", which are also allegedly Valverde's fault. If he had played today, two things could've happened.
1) he'd cause havoc, use his pace for good, dribble himself out of tricky situations involving tight spaces...
or 2) he'd lose the ball often, not being able to dribble, couldn't cope with the pressure Atletico imposed et cetera
So, how would that influence his confidence? With media calling him a fraud?
Also, did you notice how our defensive strategy worked? Avoiding their pressure traps?
Maybe he wasn't ready for the match in that aspect.
I don't know why he didn't play, but tbh, I think a coach has every right to decide.
not a fan of it, neither-Valverde’s treatment of Semedo
but Roberto has shown more going forward which was crucial for us
also, Semedo has played quite a few matches
Iniesta almost never plays full 90 minutes.-Running Iniesta into the ground when we have Coutinho, who is not available in the CL, meaning we sorely need a fresh Iniesta against Chelsea.
Last time he played before Las Palmas? Chelsea 10 days before.
Injuries happen if you play too much but also if you don't. It's crucial for Iniesta to keep it warm.
You can't connect (you can, but cannot prove) his injury to his playing time, so it's not on Valverde.