Speaking for myself, I have been critical of Busquets, Roberto, Suarez for a while. I was also critical of Rakitic to a lesser extent but appreciated some of his qualities, so my views on him were mixed, ideally I saw him as a rotation player. With Rakitic, I like having a player of his profile in the squad because I think it’s important. (Rakitic in his current form isn’t the ideal player for this role anymore).
With Valverde, I gave him credit because he joined when Barca was at a bad moment and brought a stabilising influence. He saw the limitataions of some senior players and played a pragmatic style which put them in a position to succeed, instead of playing tiki taka foolishly with a team that can’t execute it. I hoped at the end of the first season that he would transition to a more familiar style and integrate the technical players as they joined the club. In the second season he didn’t really do that, but was still playing a pragmatic style and getting results, so I gave him credit for that. Still I knew that Barca needed a new direction and was saying before the Liverpool game that Barca needed a new coach in the summer that can develop youth and return to a familiar style.
The reason I may have appeared as a “Valverde supporter” is that I was giving credit for the pragmatism, and felt that it was being under appreciated. Long term, I don’t want Barca to play that style, but I thought it was a good move in the short term. I think long term, Barca should try to play the familiar style, with some experienced/physical players thrown in because it keeps a balanced squad, lets Barca play a different style when needed, be able to match physical teams if they need to while still being a technical team overall.