It's one match calma.
Messi is back, time for a 40 match win streak
It's one match calma.
Messi is back, time for a 40 match win streak
Why did he choose that midfield when we finally looked that we had found the right combo? Messi looks fat and uninterested.
Yes it is a U-Turn. Quite a large one, but one has to hold one's hands up when one is wrong. Sadly, I think I have been proven wrong.
Putting aside the ridiculousness of that statement, here are some facts:
If a player looks fat and uninterested the coach must bench him (Messi by your sayings).
If a player is out of form the coach must bench him (Suarez).
If a player consistently performs amazingly he should be a starter (Arthur).
If a player consistently performs badly he should not be a starter (Rakitic).
If a player is not a winger, but a CDM/CM, he shouldn't be playing on the wing (FDJ).
If a young player plays his first match for the team away from home and makes one serious mistake, he shouldn't be replaced at half time by a player playing out of
position, because his confidence will go down the drain (Firpo).
If a player is by nature a RB, he shouldn't be playing on the opposite flank (Semedo), more so if the team has a natural LB (who may or may have not been left out of the squad list, even though he was the only backup for that particular position) (Firpo).
If a player is not a winger, he should not be played on either wing (Griezmann).
If a player is a CM, he shouldn't be playing as a RB (Sergi), if the team has two natural RBs (Semedo, Wague).
If a player plays decently in the first game of the season away from home for 45' and is not the worst player out there, he should not be benched at half time and made to disappear from the face of the earth for the next games. (Alena).
If a player doesn't have a place in the squad planning for a season, he should be notified so he can search for another team (Vidal).
How much more can a coach mismanage a squad in the span of a few weeks?
If we don't sack Valverde, we are done.
Putting aside the ridiculousness of that statement, here are some facts:
If a player looks fat and uninterested the coach must bench him (Messi by your sayings).
If a player is out of form the coach must bench him (Suarez).
If a player consistently performs amazingly he should be a starter (Arthur).
If a player consistently performs badly he should not be a starter (Rakitic).
If a player is not a winger, but a CDM/CM, he shouldn't be playing on the wing (FDJ).
If a young player plays his first match for the team away from home and makes one serious mistake, he shouldn't be replaced at half time by a player playing out of
position, because his confidence will go down the drain (Firpo).
If a player is by nature a RB, he shouldn't be playing on the opposite flank (Semedo), more so if the team has a natural LB (who may or may have not been left out of the squad list, even though he was the only backup for that particular position) (Firpo).
If a player is not a winger, he should not be played on either wing (Griezmann).
If a player is a CM, he shouldn't be playing as a RB (Sergi), if the team has two natural RBs (Semedo, Wague).
If a player plays decently in the first game of the season away from home for 45' and is not the worst player out there, he should not be benched at half time and made to disappear from the face of the earth for the next games. (Alena).
If a player doesn't have a place in the squad planning for a season, he should be notified so he can search for another team (Vidal).
How much more can a coach mismanage a squad in the span of a few weeks?
If we don't sack Valverde, we are done.
I agree with many of you - Firpo needs time and chances to build up!
If EV distroys him with benching and so on... just to bring back Messi's buddy Alba (30) in 5 weeks.
It was EV job to make sure Firpo does not blunder TWICE in the first minute... but EV did not do his job nor any of his co-trainers.
Firpo's mistake is on him. Punishing him though is Valverde's mistake.
He is an exceptional player, but not the leader we need. This team is without a single leader. Puyol and Xavi were the leaders of this team. When both were gone, and Alves, Mascherano left too, there was nobody else.
Iniesta and Messi are legends, and both among the best players of all time. But they aren't leaders. Leaders feel when the road we're on leads to nowhere land and they react. Both during the season, and during matches as well.
Excellent comment.
About Messi, disappointed and impressed by him at the same time. I truly believe he is the main reason Valverde is still the manager, both in a good way (playing amazing and carrying us to La Liga titles like never before imo), and in a bad way for not showing his captain qualities. He put the icing on the cake by supporting Valverde when it was clear to everyone the guy is a loser and an incompetent for this level.
He is an exceptional player, but not the leader we need. This team is without a single leader. Puyol and Xavi were the leaders of this team. When both were gone, and Alves, Mascherano left too, there was nobody else.
Iniesta and Messi are legends, and both among the best players of all time. But they aren't leaders. Leaders feel when the road we're on leads to nowhere land and they react. Both during the season, and during matches as well.
What we are now is a club without a leader, with an incompetent trying to pose as a real manager, without a single type A personality in the team to rally the troops, with a terrible board. All we have is a top squad which is horrifically managed from top to bottom.