Not really. Just means his ankle heals finally, but they don't know how it will react to pressure after 3 times breaking it, so they need to test it in training.That's a confusing ass statement.
Frenkie has improved a lot. He is expected to return to training, as reported a few days back, after the break. If he recovers well, it won’t take long for him to play again - but if things don’t go well, surgery would be needed, keeping him out for longer.
@Luis_F_Rojo
So he recovers well, but they still don't know how his ankle will react to pressure during the training. And then there's the problem that in training no one will actually takle him for real, while in the game another Valverde gonna crash fullspeed into his leg, so it's try out and see in his case from this point onwards.
This. Lots of players will target that ankle. Doesn't even need to be an impact, a heavy shoulder to shoulder could break it too.Fede and Camavinga are just waiting to target that ankle in a big match.
This. Lots of players will target that ankle. Doesn't even need to be an impact, a heavy shoulder to shoulder could break it too.
His market value is going to dip heavily I believe.
I'm thinking in case of a relapse he will opt for surgery, but until then he will work on returning to the pitch.Since the player himself precluded surgery, if he has a replase as soon as he starts training/playing,
then how do you think a club should proceed in this case?
It is clear that the player has his own personal plan which does not meet the needs and expectations of the team
Ansu's case was butchered so badly by the club that Jorge Mendes paid out of his own pocket to fly him to a surgeon they actually trusted. Was sadly too late by then.
A surgery might have helped bring Frenkie back quicker, but could also have shortened his career. Who knows? Players always get second opinions and after some of the earlier mishaps by the club I don't blame our players for being skeptical about their practices.