Beast, I don't know why I argue with you, it must be some bad trait of mine. *sigh*
Could you please point out why the monetary value of Ibra -considering the whole situation before the negotiations started- is less than that of Eto'o? I've read your post and see no indication of that here.
My whole point is that there is no way in hell that Eto'o was worth more money than Ibra in this deal. Please stick to that.
(As an aside, I don't elaborate on posts etc. that I deem 'unworthy' of sorts. I could nitpick each point that this guy mentions ex: Arsenal stick to having their preseason close by but that's helped them achieve fuck all...Not to begin on what CA already said but his guy thinks he knows training better than the very top professionals? I'd like to see what his methods have achieved outside of
FM
but I'd rather not. That is the reason why I posted what I did on the Zlatan topic and not here initially. I don't deem this article worthy of discussion, so I wont bother giving my detailed opinion on it. That is precisely the reason why I ignore most your childish insults)
EDIT: Oh and before you get carried away and post something irrelevant: I'd like to see you address :
1. "There are so many aspects to the real (market/sale) value of both players which makes Ibra's value far superior to that of Eto'o. The most basic economic concept is ofcourse we're selling a good that we don't want or a "must-go" while Inter are selling something they don't want to unless it's an offer they can't refuse
(or grossly above their valuation of him)"
2. "Then there is the fact about their contracts..."(By this I obviously meant their pre-existing ones...)
3. PS Another point is the African Cup.
In fairness, my first (also oscy's) and last point are subjective so I can see you having a differing opinion on that.