Birdy
Senior Member
That is mean!
Ok I will answer you that you are correct that Koeman wanted a much more expensive attacker than Luuk de Jong. As he didn't get one, he has all the right to whine like a 2 year old about the players not being able to play tici-taco!
I must say, overall, you use some words that you think sound fancy, but they only weaken your arguments and your style. You don't give many 'points' yourself, I don't see anything that I didn't respond to in a fitting way.
I have covered all the above extensively the last year.
There is no point in repeating, besides If I collect all these extensive responses, you will have a 30 page text
I am only addressing extensively arguments or points not addressed in the past here
I will give you just 1 example:
For instance, it is a lie (if said on purpose knowing the truth) or a false claim (if said unknowingly on good will) to say that Koeman did not get the best out of Messi.
On the contrary, he tinkered things to accommodate Messi but Messi for the most part failed to convert as he did in the past
Since Ernie left, Messi's convertion rate had been abysmall compared to his usual standards (this is well-documented and I have covered it in my posts backed with the data) He improved in the 2nd half of 20/21 but didn't reach his old levels
Both Setien and Koeman were affected by that.
I assume you know that already right? Or not?
Then why do you repeat the same false claim?
BF seems a place where the one who shouts the most wins, rather than the one who has a valid, and properly justified, argument
Last edited: