1. fair enough.
2. oh ok, so we're using overrated in its proper context now? righteous. you can understand why I, after the maradona debates, would think that on this place overrated is basically synonymous with cack.
3. what?! who the fuck am I thinking of that's irish, then?
also yeah if he's english that's thoroughly confusing. although again, I suppose it could be a case of busby was first, so we'll give him a knighthood (plus he did suffer through munich - sentimentality is a powerful force, in fact that was probably the deciding factor that pushed him ahead of shanks and even big jock). and then again, fergie was the first one after heysel and dragged english football back onto the map.
you can make a case for paisley deserving a knighthood, and I wouldn't disagree, but if you go by the rationale that back in the day they only gave them out to truly rare individuals then it kinda makes sense. paisley didn't suffer for liverpool, he took over the title winners shanks had created and took them to the next level. impressive, but not as impressive as what busby, clough and fergie did (if only shankly had won a european cup).
and paisley's dead now, so, like, why would you give a dead man a knighthood?
that's another key thing, actually.
when paisley was alive, only busby had a knighthood. and no one else had matched what he did (and I don't just mean success but overcoming adversity). so it makes sense for no one else to have one.
but then when you give fergie one, for an admittedly impressive achievement, it does leave you wondering why clough and paisley were left out. but paisley was dead when fergie was awarded his. and again, why give a dead guy a knighthood?
still doesn't explain clough, though.