Armando929
New member
Alba over Adriano for me. IMO he offers more to us in attack and is less prone to mistakes.
bigger by 2 cm is not too much difference but anyway he is better defendingFantastic points PhilS. Adriano is just bigger and is so helpful against the better aerial squads while Alba in attack is a disaster for defenses. Tito can now shuffle his cards when needed.
la masia !!!they're different. It's just that i'm dreaming of seeing this starting 11:
villa messi pedro
iniesta busquets xavi
alba puyol pique alves
valdes
...and hope we can get there bit by bit. Introducing alba into big games would be one of those bits and it would make me happy.
As you can see, no real reason behind that other than the fact that i'd be happy. :barca scarf:
i think pique was more responsible there because he left alba alone there when it was not nessesary at all. puyol was covering front post and pique wanted to mark him, instead of going to help alba at the back post.
I thought he was really good tonight. Also, surprised me by how well he did defensive work. I think there was a moment where he even got Pique/Masch out of trouble. Should be a default starter, IMHO.
He did OK, but must improve his passing by miles - I think he missed maybe 10 easy passes during this match (but also every time I saw him play, both for the NT and Valencia). If he can improve his passing, decision making and maybe his defensive work (just a little, imo he's doing good) - he will come good.
He did OK, but must improve his passing by miles - I think he missed maybe 10 easy passes during this match (but also every time I saw him play, both for the NT and Valencia). If he can improve his passing, decision making and maybe his defensive work (just a little, imo he's doing good) - he will come good.