F
Flavia
Guest
Laporta asked for an explanation about Can Rigalt. Google translation of his tweet about it:
1. That during my tenure had no knowledge of this arbitration.
2. That in case there existed this arbitration during my term, I am convinced that the drivers of corporate liability action against the economic management of my board had they included in their claims, which did not occur.
3. During my tenure at FCB, the sale of land of Can Rigalt treated with the utmost transparency and efficiency. It was a very profitable operation for the interests of FCB.
4. As a result of the good work that made the agreement between FCB, the City of L'Hospitalet de Llobregat and the company Fecsa-Endesa, possible was achieved revalue some land, which entailed substantially improve FCB heritage.
5. In the manifestations of FCB spokesman who is not "seek to blame" for which the club must buy back the land, I ask for detailed explanations of the whole matter:
a) When the FCB became aware of this conflict?
b) When the arbitration claim was filed and who filed?
c) What has been the failure by the FCB has led to an award condemn the club to undo?
d) Why he has been hiding for so long this conflict?
6. We must act with the utmost transparency and in this sense I demand the immediate release of the award to all partners and members of the FCB have knowledge of how it has come to this situation. And I ask people who have managed this issue to give the necessary explanations to the barcelonista social mass.