Horatio
You're welcome
To a lot of people still the rivalry between Barcelona and Real is a battle of brains vs brawn.
Since we are regarded as the 'intelligent' club a more stoic coach would fit us more image-wise than an emotional one.
To a lot of people still the rivalry between Barcelona and Real is a battle of brains vs brawn.
Since we are regarded as the 'intelligent' club a more stoic coach would fit us more image-wise than an emotional one.
Horatio
You're welcome
Ahh...this was to be expected.
I am 100% right though.
Why do you think people keep bringing up that Barca has a 'philosphy' opposed to Real having none.
khaled_a_d
Senior Member
I agree with Origami ,Barca DNA & La Masia are some of ways to sell Barca brand. RM have the "most successful club in the world", Galactico and their ability in the transfer market to attract world biggest stars
DonAK
President of FC Barcelona
Expect Barcelona to go for the worse option just because they're going to stretch the Barca DNA thing way too far. If Valverde who has rejected Real Madrid previously still stays at Athletic Bilbao, I fully expect us to pay 8m for Koeman instead of the 1.5m for Sampaoli, despite the latter having more resemblance of Barca DNA is his coaching, and some of the key players in the squad's first option if they had the ability to choose.
JamDav1982
Senior Member
That is not even close to what debate was though.
It was about how each club treats managers and time given and the tpye of personalities each club goes for.
F
FlaFCB
Guest
Sadly, this is what will happen. Valverde or Koeman.
DonAK
President of FC Barcelona
In Mundo Deportivo's Pros and cons for every coach linked to the club, they say Sampaoli's association with Messi could dissuade the board from signing him which makes no sense unless they're afraid of losing control of the club to Sampaoli and Messi
http://www.mundodeportivo.com/futbo...verde-unzue-koeman-eusebio-quique-setien.html
Horatio
You're welcome
lol it wasn't just managers man. When I referred to how we were perceived as the 'intelligent' club I took more things into consideration.
Beautiful football, not relying on physical tall players, La Masia, trainer management, non-aggressive players, acting according to a vision a.k.a philosophy. Barca garnered a lot of sympathy from the world a few years ago and Real didn't(thank you Mourinho).
JamDav1982
Senior Member
The managers were the only issue being debated.
None of that other stuff was part of it at all.
F
FlaFCB
Guest
In Mundo Deportivo's Pros and cons for every coach linked to the club, they say Sampaoli's association with Messi could dissuade the board from signing him which makes no sense unless they're afraid of losing control of the club to Sampaoli and Messi
http://www.mundodeportivo.com/futbo...verde-unzue-koeman-eusebio-quique-setien.html
Just hope it won't be Koeman. He would surely clash with some of the players. It'd be a spectacular failure.
Horatio
You're welcome
But that's not the post Khaled is responding to however. So you bringing up the trainers discussion is irrelevant in the first place.
JamDav1982
Senior Member
What post was he referring to?
When everyone else is discussing the manager it is irrelevant for you to bring up things that are not related. More so than anything I said.
Horatio
You're welcome
We discussed the trainer management in another thread.
Khaled responded to a post of mine in THIS thread where I mentioned how the board possibly would consider a certain coach a mismatch with the image Barca has garnered the last decade.
JamDav1982
Senior Member
Your post was in relation to the image of the club and type of manager that fits that as I said originally and disagree with.
Home of Barca Fans
