Is Odegaard even better than Alena? Looks to me like the same type of player.
Cool as you like lad. Watch some games, try to actually make cogent arguments against Zidane (or anyone else), maybe you won't get called out on it so often then and it'll save you from going to your "yea yea bla bla" fluffy routines
Alena is not even in the same bracket. Ødegaard is different class.
All I did was saying it was a cross fest in the first half and you started mumbling.
All I did was saying it was a cross fest in the first half and you started mumbling. Did Zidane prove this tactics work without Ronaldo? No. Then you didn't win any argument. Stop flattering yourself.
Seems so atm, (he's been pretty poor in this game so far though). But I've seen situations fluctuating a lot.
Nope. You were saying this is all Zidane can do as well as a bunch of other things that are untrue or nonsensical. I provided you with explanations and clarifications. To which you responded with "yea yea". It's OK to admit you're wrong man.
Bale on. Hope he does a golf swing in the face of critics.
Benzema goal and assist. Both from crosses. Poor choice of tactics.
Yeah, bar the first 15-20 minutes. I remain unimpressed by Odegaard. I just dont see it yet.
Benzema goal and assist. Both from crosses. Poor choice of tactics.
Crossing the ball is one of the simplest, yet most effective ways to score in football. Most teams outside of Barca employ it as one of their main tactics and it usually allows for space to open up down the middle later in the match.
If you have players that are good in the air why wouldn't you employ it? Don't have time for the purist blokes that brand anything that isn't intricate one-touch passing as a "lack of tactics."
This is the problem when Barca fans use 2011 Barca as their reference for judging football. Many warped perspectives.
Lol, we do employ crosses too. We just don't abuse them. We abuse other things, like passing to Messi.