The definition of 'fanboyism' is that you idolize him without any grip on reality.
You don't see any negative traits (on and off the field), you don't see any difference between his past and his present, and you reduce the latter to the former.
You try to find cheap excuses for him as if you are his mother or something.
And this is beyond the point of having a healthy idol, it's kind of sickening tbf.
And it gives you the answer why people who criticize Messi here repeat the same old stuff. Because none of their points have been properly answered.
What is heard, instead, from the 'Messi fanboy' camp, apart from the excuses about his performances and attitude, are only insults and teenage responses (like us being 'judas', embarrassment of fans for club, i3 venture trolls, mentally ill, etc etc).
If you want nuanced and articulated opinion, you have to first accept what any non-biased observer witnesses week in week out.
Instead of trying to immediately come up with excuses for him, just distance yourself and try to objectively pass a judgment.
I don't see why you have made it so difficult to do so. You act as if it's betrayal to admit it.
Think that all of us (people criticizing Messi here) were also his admirers not so long ago.
But as Luftstalag said above, we are supporters of the club first and foremost, and when the club suffers we will point to all the problems, even if a legend of the club is currently a problem.
in my opinion it is not true that he does not commit, indeed I think he does a lot.
How do you know that he dictates these things (can't be rested, can't be subbed)? In case it's Koeman's fault..
What he earns is established by the market, if he earns more than he owes then bravo!
Here is an illustrative example of how you don't answer the point repeatedly made by Messi critics.
You say 'in my opinion', without countering any point.
Each opinion here is worth nothing unless backed by argumentation that seeks to be objective.
We have several facts: That he plays every game all minutes unless injured, and that had been the case for many years with many different coaches.
And your answer to that is that it's Koeman's fault. How can it be so? If it was Koeman's problem, it would have occurred only during Koeman's time.
Think for yourself how it's possible with so many different coaches and through so many different periods this fact to remain unchanged?
We have also other evidence (not proof, but strong evidence) about how he is in training and as a professional.
Read Setien's recent interview. It's eye-opening. He says Messi is hard to manage and the club has let be like that for years.
You cannot just bypass and ignore that piece of information if you want to be objective (especially since it provides a clue that answers many situations witnessed). You just can't.
But you won't read it because you think it's not worth, or you categorize it as 'gossip'. But gossip is saying 'i know someone who knows someone who ... claims that Messi is a spoiled kid'. It's not gossip to read anecdotal information coming from someone who has worked with him and seen him day in day out (even for 6 months).
How can we reach common ground if you just dismiss anything that is coming out as negative about Messi??