Vilarrubi
New member
Griezzman bad finisher? Like how Arthur is a bad midfielder?
Exactly lol
If Griezmann is a bad finisher then what is Suarez.. love to see both of their shot/goal ratio's.
Griezzman bad finisher? Like how Arthur is a bad midfielder?
Dont know what to think of this guy... Playing so frustrating, yet making some stuff that no other striker, even player bar Messi can do.
1. Suarez can score, but is not consistent
2. Griezmann is a bad finisher and also inconsistent
What to do then?
Out of Suarez vs Griezz, Suarez is less bad in terms of goals, which is a no1 duty of a CF.
Other options are: almost 33 years old Messi as a No9 and rely on wingers: kid Fati and hot and cold Dembele.
When you sum it all: a winger Fati/Dembele-Suarez-Messi is by far the best option in this moment.
Dont know what to think of this guy... Playing so frustrating, yet making some stuff that no other striker, even player bar Messi can do.
Griezzman bad finisher? Like how Arthur is a bad midfielder?
Exactly lol
If Griezmann is a bad finisher then what is Suarez.. love to see both of their shot/goal ratio's.
Surprise, surprise... Defensively obsessed BBZ doesn't mention defensive workrate difference between Griezmann and Suarez, so he can still be the contrarian...
Amazing.
The fact is that we won't win CL defending with 8 outfield players (since Leo and Luis don't defend). We will get shafted in the knockouts against teams with very high work rate.
If Valverde was smart, he would be playing Dembele/Fati-Messi/Surez-Griezmann in away games, simply because we would shut down the opponent's flanks better...
Lel.
Anyway.
Stats:
2018/19 La Liga:
Suarez 109 shots, 21 goals=5,19 shots needed for 1 goal
Griezmann 110 shots, 15 goals=7,33 shots needed for 1 goal
This season, La Liga and a CL:
Suarez 17 shots, 5 goals=3,4 shots needed for 1 goal
Griezmann 23 shots, 3 goals=7,67 shots needed for 1 goal
If you check stats from La Liga 2018/19 and 7-8 matches for Barca this season (last 15 Months), you get a total:
Suarez 126 shots, 26 goals=4,84 shots needed for 1 goal
Griezmann 133 shots, 18 goals=7,39 shots needed for 1 goal
lol not sure where you got your stats from, feel free to post, but according to whoscored.com:
Suarez 18/19 + 19/20 shots = 198
Suarez 18/19 + 19/20 goals = 31
Shots per goal = 6.38
Griezmann 18/19 + 19/20 shots = 189
Griezmann 18/19 + 19/20 goals = 28
Shots per goal = 6.75
In fact they are more or less the same, I presumed Griezmann would have a much better ratio than Suarez BUT you described Griezmann as a bad finisher and inconsistent which is also bullshit.
Griezmann said:2018-19: Past his peak?
Griezmann turned down the opportunity to leave Atletico before the 2018-19 season commenced and went on to have one of his most disappointing seasons in Madrid.
Simeone's men won the UEFA Super Cup but were knocked out of the Champions League in the round of 16 by Juventus and failed to prevent Barcelona from winning LaLiga with three games to spare.
On a personal level, Griezmann scored 15 league goals and 21 in all competitions – both his poorest tallies in a single season for the club – and his shot conversion rate dropped to 13.64 per cent in LaLiga and 15.44 per cent overall, the lowest since he left La Real.
Only time will tell if he can rediscover his best form next season, when he will be lining up against Atleti for Barca.
I know that you guys hate a current Suarez from the bottom of your heart, but that won't turn Griezmann into a lethal scorer.
He was always a weird supportive/playmaker attacker-Cam for counterattacking teams.
He is slow, he is short, he can't dribble, and as stats say: he is not a lethal finisher.
Lel.
Anyway.
Stats:
2018/19 La Liga:
Suarez 109 shots, 21 goals=5,19 shots needed for 1 goal
Griezmann 110 shots, 15 goals=7,33 shots needed for 1 goal
lmao so much time wasted just to troll, desperate statistics grab that say nothing, if 7,33 is a bad finisher, then Ronaldo with 8.13 is even worse than a bad finisher? Garbage finisher?
1. In general, a goal is to have a lethal finisher who doesn't need 7, 8 or 10 shots to score 1 goal
2. Unless if that player is somehow getting into 10 chances per match, so he is still scoring 1 goal per match, inspite of missing tons of chances
Griezmann both:
1. Needs too many shots to score
2. And isn't getting into too many chances per match like Salah or younger CR7, due to his (Griezmann) weak pace, weakish physique, being short and having bad dribbling skills.
He can't create a chance on his own with dribbling his way through 4 defenders like Messi or Neymar.
He can't get into space to receive a through ball on counters like Salah or Mane.
He can't get into 5-10 chances per match due to his physique and positioning like CR7.
Basically, he relies on his teammates to set him opportunities, and once when he gets into those chances, his finishing rate is quite average for the highest level.
Not to mention that he seems to be even slower this season than in the past.
And his finishing rate has dropped in the last 16 Months.
What is trolling in my post?
The only problem is that you probably hate Suarez and you want another player.
But your wish and sadness won't turn Griezmann into a lethal finisher.
In general, we need a replacement for Suarez.
But Griezmann surely won't be that guy.
If you want to win titles, of course.
If you want a 3rd place in La liga and a pattern or results: 2:1, 0:0, 2:0, 0:1, 1:1, 0:0, Griezz will be a good striker for you.