spring
New member
he increased our income as he did with our debt
none of them are perfect, both are stubborn, someone kicked out eto'o and after-that we spent more than 100 million euro to find someone to replace him (and couldn't) , and another one prefer to lose all titles but save a little more money! one of them paid more than 50 ml.e for chigi and kierson and... and another one didn't pay 5 ml.e more for silve!
laporta was good because whenever team needed, he was ready to buy new players and rosell is good because he doesn't sell stars, at least not in a low price!
and...
i still prefer rosell
Last edited:
gun-powder
New member
he increased our income as he did with our debt
none of them are perfect, both are stubborn, someone kicked out eto'o and after-that we spent more than 100 million euro to find someone to replace him (and couldn't) , and another one prefer to lose all titles but save a little more money! one of them paid more than 50 ml.e for chigi and kierson and... and another one didn't pay 5 ml.e more for silve!
laporta was good because whenever team needed, he was ready to buy new players and rosell is good because he doesn't sell stars, at least not in a low price!
and...
i still prefer rosellbut if we lose this ucl, maybe i don't say this again!
selling etoo is not problem for laporta instead he like him and wont him to stay but guardiola he insist to sell him and replace it with zalatan
khaled_a_d
Senior Member
he increased our income as he did with our debt
none of them are perfect, both are stubborn, someone kicked out eto'o and after-that we spent more than 100 million euro to find someone to replace him (and couldn't) , and another one prefer to lose all titles but save a little more money! one of them paid more than 50 ml.e for chigi and kierson and... and another one didn't pay 5 ml.e more for silve!
laporta was good because whenever team needed, he was ready to buy new players and rosell is good because he doesn't sell stars, at least not in a low price!
and...
i still prefer rosellbut if we lose this ucl, maybe i don't say this again!
In comparison to other European big clubs,Laporta actually decreased our debts
Did laporta sell our starts in low prices?other thanEto I would say no ,R10 was done at the club and that was his market value ,same goes with Deco and almost any one not named Eto ,and Eto was Pep's stupid mistake ,Laporta worst decisions was to try to sign some unproven young players with huge price(Chygrynsky/Caceras/Henrique/Keirreson etc) those signings he made in 2008&2009 was awful tbh
Also ,Rosell is one who sold Ibra for like half of his value
The worst part about Rosell that it isn't just we don't pay money,it is th fact we aren't even spending them right ,Sanchez/Afellay/Song are half of the players he signed in 3 years ,cesc is good but wasn't a real need,and even Mascherano was bought to be a DM ,if it wasn't for Pep switching him to CB he would have been an awful signing too (as he isn't a good fit in the DM and was paid a lot to be Busquits back up) .on the other hand he failed to bring a good CB
Home of Barca Fans
