evilhita666
Barçapocalypse NOW!
He also would have gotten thrashed had he played... In a way, it's better he didn't get to play...
Roberto had no support from the CMs or Messi in defense. Hard to excel in such situations. But he did have a very bad defensive perfomance even for his standards. Doubt Semedo would have saved us today though.
Keep riding that Roberto fangirl train. He could score 3 own goals and you'd still defend him.
It really fits your agenda.
You are lucky that Semedo did not play today
This defensively shambolic performance wasn't about Roberto, Semedo would have struggled just as much because he is not a defensive beast like he is made out to be here..
irony
the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.
Well that's the whole shindig isn't it? That a good player like Semedo didn't play over a lawn-chair like Roberto.
Except Semedo has consistently been good defensively when playing with the same group of players despite being treated like dirt by our gutless "manager"
When you resort to "but but x player would have bad too" to defend your favorite player you've lost the argument
That's a myth. Check the stats. The eye test can be deceitful. I also do not agree that Semedo has shown anything to display that he is better than Roberto. To tell you the truth, I was emphatic when Semedo arrived: I posted messages like "thank fuck we finally have a real RB and Roberto can play in midfield now", but it turned out that Semedo is simply not that good. I get your frustration with Roberto's defensive mishaps because you scrutinize his every mistake and overanalyze, but atm there is no better available right back on the market for Barca than Roberto.
Hahahahah so we shouldn't trust our eyes now and look at "stats". Are you a fan of Trump by any chance?
Semedo hasn't been good defensively? What games have you been watching?
Weren't you Roberto groupies saying Roberto should start because his attacking prowess makes up for his lack of defensive prowess? You''ll revision everything to defend Roberto won't you
No better RB than Roberto for Barca. Now i've heard it all
I did not refute the fact that Roberto is better in attack as well. Check the statistics fam.
You are really having your way with twisting my words. I said that there is no better available RB on the market than Roberto, not that there is a better RB than Roberto for Barca at all, which are two fundamentally different things.
I also watched all Barca games this season, and Semedo just doesn't cut it. I did not say that we can't trust our eyes either, I said that the eye test can be deceitful. Why do you over exaggerate everything?
You goto argument is "check the stats". Do you even watch our games.
"Eye test can be deceitful". How else is one supposed to interpret your words
Any half decent RB from a half decent team would be better than Roberto because he's a lawnchair who gets folded by any half decent attacker. Not to mention we have a better RB than him on our bench.
Roberto better in attack and defense than Semedo? Is he better in bed too? You would know wouldn't you
About the eye test, what I mean is that your visual impression is not the most accurate way to assess a player's level, but relying on statistics only is not correct either because according to them Ozil is the best playmaker to have ever existed. It should be a mixture of both, and I just don't see Semedo's supposed superiority, nor do the stats reflect it.