And you seriously think the tactical improvement is for a large part because of Neymar leaving instead of oh you know....having a new tactically superior coach?
It depends on players also.
If Neymar were here, we would have played differently.
I don't want to go offtopic, but let's make a bet: Dembele in, and we'll lose some % of our midfield balance and defensive strength.
Just change 1 player in the lineup, change a formation a little and you have a totally different team in defense, midfield, attack, through the middle and on wings.
A huge part of our stability was NOT having individual risky players like Neymar.
Again, I am 99% sure that we will now lose a part of that stability once when Dembele will play, because he is a player more similar to Neymar than to safe midfielders from our 442.
If we will lose a part of stability with Dembele's entrance, imo, that is a proof how much players are influencing defense-midfield-attack balance.
And that it is not ALL only because of Lucho/EV.
I do agree with JamDav that maybe we could have kept some balance with Neymar under EV, but only if we played 4411 with Messi and Neymar upfront and Suarez on the bench.
There is no way that we would have these type of midfield and defensive balance with ALL MSN trio on the field.
Again, you can't have too many risky players in attack who will try a lot of risky moves (and thus losing a lot of balls) and keeping possession and defensive stability.
1. more risk=>more lost balls=>more counters against you=>more conceded goals
2. less risk&more safe passes=>less lost balls=>less counters against you=>less conceded goals and less chaos and run and gun approach in general.
I am not saying that we shouldn't play risky passes EVER.
But Messi knows when to play risky.
Yet, Neymar is a dumb who played risky in EVERY single action when he received the ball. And that was like 30 times per match.
Some will reply: but with more players like MSN, you have more attacking options, and more risky passes and more players who are TRYING to create something means=more chances and more goals.
Well, only up to a certain point.
If we would play with 10 Messis on a field, we would clearly create a ton of chances, but on the other hand, we would face 70-80 deadly counters per match.
At the end of the day, a funny thing is:
1. 442 without Neymar is creating more or the same amount of shots than MSN's 433. So, with only 2 attacking players (Messi and Luis), we are creating as much or even more than with 3 risky players in MSN.
2. on the other hand, EV's 442 is way more defensively strong than MSN's 433.
So, basically, with going from 3 attacking players to 2 attacking players, we didn't lose THAT much in creation.
We are scoring the same as before.
And yet, our midfield balance and defense improved a lot.
One more time, if we'll buy Griezmann, quite possibly it will turn out that 4 or 5 attacking players AREN'T creating more chances and AREN'T bringing more victories than a cautious 442 from EV's which is winning all matches with 1:0 or 2:0 and clean sheets.
A team with 4-5 attacking players will probably win 6:1 one day and play 3:3 and 3:4 three days later.
Awesome attack, and yet weaker midfield balance and a defense (and a whole team) extremely prone to counters.