You keep repeating that, but it’s just not true. Lamine stayed on when we were chasing results… not Raphina. There’s more than goals and assists.
Context. We weren't chasing a result and especially in the 2nd leg it would have been madness to keep Lamine on with 10 men.Like what? Workrate, defensive coverage, stamina? Raphinha is better than him in areas falling outside of goals and assists. And of course, there's the fact that goals and assist for an attacker are of absolutely key importance.
Lamine got subbed instead of Raphinha vs PSG no? Got subbed in the first leg ahead of Raphinha too. Those were the biggest games this season.
I have a feeling Lamine's going to play a similar amount of games like this season. If Niko comes, Yamal needs to go on a loan, or he is not going to get enough games under his belt.
The likes of Cubarsi and Yamal are established starters.
Just need to get some good depth to give them a rest.
Xavi played both Yamal and Cubarsi because they were good enough to play for the 1st team (the phrase "if you are good enough, you are old enough" applies to them both). Did the injuries and loss of form of other players helped them both in getting those crucial initial game time? Yes, but they justifiably kept their place due to their good performances even when there were other options as well such as Inigo Martinez and Raphinha in their respective positions (even when both of them came back from injury, Cubarsi and Yamal still justifiably kept their place)Cubarsi isn't established starter, he started because we were forced to put Kounde as RB after Balde getting injured, and Christensen as DM due to lack of alternatives, both are superior CB, he did great for 17 years old, but despite a good patch when the team was great he was a mixed form otherwise. His positioning, physical profile, aerial ability are all questionable once you judge him without the "17 years old" tag.
Lamine was also a starter due to the team getting into the season with only 2 wingers in Ferran and Raphinha who both got injured good part of the season, with Torres never coming back to his form from early on, and Gavi ( our false winger) being injured while Felix being mediocre.
Lamine did great regardless of age, but we also need to remember that Xavi system is very favourable to a player like him tbh.
If you invest in a winger like Nico, then Yamal should be first attacker from the bench, mainly because you have to protect him. Every La Masia/Barca youngster who played heavy minutes before the age of 18 has suffered serious injury setback in his early career (Bojan, Fati, Gavi & Pedri), even if his talent warrant him taking a bigger role. Barca need to stop gambling with those kids' future by overplaying them at young age.
Then what problem do you have with my previous post?I don’t think Lamine or Cubarsi were overplayed. Xavi managed them well if you ask me.
Cubarsi isn't established starter, he started because we were forced to put Kounde as RB after Balde getting injured, and Christensen as DM due to lack of alternatives, both are superior CB, he did great for 17 years old, but despite a good patch when the team was great he was a mixed form otherwise. His positioning, physical profile, aerial ability are all questionable once you judge him without the "17 years old" tag.
Lamine was also a starter due to the team getting into the season with only 2 wingers in Ferran and Raphinha who both got injured good part of the season, with Torres never coming back to his form from early on, and Gavi ( our false winger) being injured while Felix being mediocre.
Lamine did great regardless of age, but we also need to remember that Xavi system is very favourable to a player like him tbh.
If you invest in a winger like Nico, then Yamal should be first attacker from the bench, mainly because you have to protect him. Every La Masia/Barca youngster who played heavy minutes before the age of 18 has suffered serious injury setback in his early career (Bojan, Fati, Gavi & Pedri), even if his talent warrant him taking a bigger role. Barca need to stop gambling with those kids' future by overplaying them at young age.
I don’t think Lamine or Cubarsi were overplayed. Xavi managed them well if you ask me.
Say what? Loan out our biggest talent since Messi? Are you for real or just very unlucky in your thought process? We have 3 players for 2 positions (I'm not really counting Torres, he's fourth choice and/or backup for Lewa) - what are you even talking about??? Also, he's 16 ffs - more games "under his belt" is what he DOESN'T need... he was overplayed because the other options sucked!I have a feeling Lamine's going to play a similar amount of games like this season. If Niko comes, Yamal needs to go on a loan, or he is not going to get enough games under his belt.
See I want him to play regularly. Yes, he is the biggest since Messi. But if we get Nico, he will have to become a substitute. Which I don't think will suit him. He needs to play 50-60% of the total games played with some being important ones. That's how you develop. If Nico comes he will mostly be a glorified Sub or we wasted the money on Nico. Both is not what we want.Say what? Loan out our biggest talent since Messi? Are you for real or just very unlucky in your thought process? We have 3 players for 2 positions (I'm not really counting Torres, he's fourth choice and/or backup for Lewa) - what are you even talking about??? Also, he's 16 ffs - more games "under his belt" is what he DOESN'T need... he was overplayed because the other options sucked!
Can the people stop with these types of personal attacks? You lose all respect you garner. I have a legit way of thinking, either you correct it or move along. Saying something like that negates whatever logic you will write in the next line.Are you for real or just very unlucky in your thought process?