Never_Forget40
Banned
Dembele might be the better player at the moment but in constrast to Rakitic Dembele showed really nothing since his arrival at Barca.
Dembele might be the better player at the moment but in constrast to Rakitic Dembele showed really nothing since his arrival at Barca.
What has Rakitic accomplished aside from being the 11th most important player on the field during the treble winning season? You could’ve put Andre Gomes in his place and the end result still would’ve been the same
Lol this isnt true. Rakitic was a key player in midfield with a very very big workrate. He isnt the same anymore.
I'd argue that a lot of Dembele's goals were lucky scuff shots (think the goals during his streak in the beginning of the season or his brace against Sevilla) and deflections, whereas the vast majority of Rashford's were quality strikes or based of intelligent movement off the ball. Don't just use stats use your eyes, there's a clear difference in the quality of goals.
Please continue discussing players's IQ as if you all:
- Knew anything about those players personally;
- Knew anything about IQ.
Ah yes. it doesn t make sense for a 21 year old guy to make some progress. Just a statistical anomaly
Once again, when we're discussing IQ we're talking about "football intelligence" - we're not actually talking about intelligence quotient; problem solving skills, analytical skills, logic puzzles solving, pattern recognition and so. When we're talking about Ronaldinho's "intelligence", we're talking about his abilities to read the game, his passing/vision, and creativity. We're not talking about his ability to understand and analyse differential equations, we're talking about skills and abilities we can evaluate by watching his performances.
Honestly, do so many of you people think we're commenting on a person's actual intelligence? I've seen complete nerds (phd students for ex.) with appalling decision making because they just freeze up when they're in possession of the ball. "Football intelligence" is just a phrase used to describe a certain aspect of athletic skills that's less physical than others like acceleration, technique, or physical strength. Things like reaction speed, 20/20 vision, and great peripheral vision play into "intelligence" in football and in other sports, but in reality it has nothing to do with IQ. It's just a term that stuck.
Once again, we're NOT talking about a player's actual intelligence.
Once again use your eyes and not stats, a lot of those goals aren't convincing. To me only about 8 or so goals of his are convincing, which is around his tally for previous clubs. Playing for this team will slightly inflate his stats imo. I'd have a different opinion if his movement was stellar and his finishing was consistent. He scorers some wonderful goals, but his movement is non-existent and his finishing technique is NOT (lol) consistent. Which is why I'm calling this season a statistical anomaly.
I might be wrong about that and I honestly don't mind.
I'm just saying, a lot of Rashford's goals are created because of his movement off the ball and/or really stellar finishing. I don't think he'll ever become world class but he shows better ability in front of goal than Dembele does.
Please continue discussing players's IQ as if you all:
- Knew anything about those players personally;
- Knew anything about IQ.
It makes for a fascinating read.
My thoughts exactly.