Let's dispel this idiotic metaphor, yes? Pedro has an identifiable gangly look to his running when he is pressing and cutting down angles between two opponents, but it is hardly without purpose (i.e. "headless chicken"). He offered similar runs in behind as Munir, and can't fault him for Dani's pass not being as "accurate" as Raktic's deflected pass. He was instructed to play at the top and received little service (expected, as he was marked by the two centerbacks), but his purpose was to open the space for others playing a man down. The few touches he received, he had 100% passing accuracy. He got one chance on goal, and took it well. His "headless chicken" running recovered a cleared ball off a defender and got it back into the box.
Let's describe Munir's game yesterday as if he were the hated Pedro:
"Sheesh, all he does is back pass."
"Sheesh, he justs gives the ball to Messi."
"Sheesh, 1v1 on the keeper with a gaping goal, and he skies it into the crossbar."
"Sheesh, he just squared the ball with no one there. Why didn't he shoot instead of always looking for Messi?"
"Yeah, nice finish, but that was a lucky deflection from Rakitic. Three chances in the box, and he only put one in. Same old Pedro."
I enjoyed the game yesterday, thought the whole team was playing well and clicking. Very entertaining. Lots of moves that didn't get a result, but were fun to watch. A fine opening game. But I guess the haters still have to find something to hate, no matter how good a performance the team put in.