serghei
Senior Member
You can’t turn stone into gold. Alberto Moreno is utter awful even under Klopp.
That is true of course. Liverpool have top players. Barcelona have at least as good individual players though, and they still play like shit.
You can’t turn stone into gold. Alberto Moreno is utter awful even under Klopp.
That is true of course. Liverpool have top players. Barcelona have at least as good individual players though, and they still play like shit.
Lol, if you change managers in that Liverpool Barcelona tie, we win it by 2-3 goals aggregate with the squads available for both managers. Fuck it man, wake up, we almost knocked out Liverpool with Valverde as a manager.
How the fuck do you draw the conclusion that the Liverpool squad is so much better, when we almost knocked them out with Ernesto Valverde as a manager (who thinks fitness is not important and the less you run the more chances you have to win), while Liverpool have the no1 guy in the world managing their team.
Lol, imagine a Liverpool with Valverde as a manager trying to come back from a 0-3 defeat on Camp Nou, while we have Messi in the field, and we are managed by Klopp .
2 years ago when Valverde was named as a Barcelona manager, our squad was rated by half a billion euros more than Liverpool's according to transfermarkt. After two years with Valverde, and 2 years for Liverpool with Klopp, all of our players declined in value, and all of Liverpool's increased in value.
We have ageing players, ergo their value progressively goes down. Pool have up and coming players, their value goes up.
The correct way to put it is that the Barcelona squad managed by an average manager like Valverde is almost as valuable as Liverpool's squad managed by an expert like Klopp.
If in 2017 we would've got Klopp and Liverpool would've appointed Valverde, the gap between the squads would be in excess of 1bn in favor of Barcelona. Simply because of the huge discrepancy between quality of the managers.
Maybe. Maybe not.
Wouldn't you consider the possibility that Liverpool were more efficient in their transfer dealings than Barca were? They seem to have the best scouting and recruiting department in all of Europe (big clubs considered) IF, that is a big IF, it was all Klopp making all the transfer decisions, then I agree, he made the difference and we should try and buy him or his aides. If not, the we should learn from Liverpool's methodology in evaluating and selecting players.
This suggestion that a manager can transform/develop players due to his inherent genius seems ludicrous to me. Just watch highlights of all the Pool players that are now world-beaters right before being signed by Liverpool, they were all in tremendous form but because they were not playing in the fanciest teams or the fanciest leagues, clubs/managers/scouts/agents/fans/pundits all overlooked them and are now surprised.
What? They just had to overturn a 3-0 against a Messi-led Barcelona with Origi and Shaqiri up front , missing two of their best players. And won the game 4-0.
Yh. Is it that surprising/shocking in hindsight? It's impressive, but obviously there are numerous 'buts' here. 1 - it's not like the epic comeback makes Klopp the mastermind here; 2- their efforts would have been undone by one goal fluffed in on the other end in that fixture.
And 2 weeks without starting forwards isn't a crisis. These happen all the time. Their rather surprising record of no long-term injuries is what should be highlighted more. Their captains seem very robust physically and are almost always present, same with more dynamic players more susceptible to some groin pull. No chronic problems after Sturridge gone. Klopp is a good fitness guru. But at some point lightning will strike their Dutch golden hen too. Or so you'd think.
You totally overrate how important Van Dijk is for them. They rarely park the bus or absorb pressure these days. They more often have a go at teams. Maybe 1-2 teams could make them play on the back food and defend for large spells.