I'm editing it to give you solid arguments regarding the investments of Spurs in their squad. Which is at the level of Arsenal.
Fair enough.
Do you genuinely think it's fair to hold Ange to the same standard as Klopp/Arteta and Pep because he has had 1 summer of spending money (signings likely already incoming regardless of his say)? Meanwhile Arteta has had 5 or 6 now, Klopp and Pep even more than that.
Spurs are starting that spending from a position of having a very weak squad. They haven't spent all that money very well too. However Ange has gotten a lot out of most of the signings. He's also getting the best out of Romero who many were starting to write off as not having the right mentality. You can't say well spurs have a squad of 800m just like Arsenal when Arteta has picked 800m/800m whereas Ange has probably picked 100m/800m.
Kane the season before Ange arrived was dragging that spurs side to where they are in the table, still only finished 8th, he scored 30 goals Ange has had to find in other players.
Then as soul mentioned they've had players going to this and that tournament not being available. He's done extremely well for the squad he has and the absences spurs have suffered this year. Doesn't mean he can suddenly be classed as a world class manager or anything. He needs to sign some decent players, get them gelled with the team and make spurs more consistent and secure top 4. He does that and he can be counted as a top manager.