Also, that article @
behindbrowneyes posted from L'Equipe via Sport, about the main cause of frequent injuries by Dembele embarrass us as a club.
Everything fits. Certainly more plausible than the scenario where his genes suddenly make him injury prone after landing in Catalunya.
Nothing is more obvious than that.
Not just because some of us (a tiny minority) said the very same things a year ago or so, but for sole logical reason, namely that there's no other logical explanation.
Probably the guy was late for one session or maybe two, which was good for the Catalan press and the haters here, but even most acid haters should admit that it's a virtual impossibility that someone becomes injured all the time, since he wasn't injury-prone earlier, at different clubs.
Sorry for the personal remark, but I trained several injury-prone players as a coach and and even if those guys are known to be sensitive and the like, it never happens the way it happened to poor Dembele, so it simply cries out for an explanation, which in his case cannot be anything else but the poor and rarely individualized training scenario.
These technically gifted sprinters have always needed special and specific training in the world of the game, which was most definitely not given to him, or carefully enough.
I would say he was very good in first year, average (to decent at best, even if I don't agree)
I rarely disagree with you but I think you are mistaken there.
Valverde was more
successful during the period of his 1st season, but at the same time that very first year of his was the
base and foundation for the decline of his later years.
He hasn't been really good ever, it was the the team still having been better almost three years ago, but EV's first year was the undeniable beginning of losing the stylistic features and his 4-4-2 was successful at times, it worked like the horizon of a black hole. His lack of tactical repertoire was the same during his 1st year, with slightly better results.