In Sandro defense he was much better last year ,or for that matter he has never been as bad as he is right now .
Not arguing he deserve to stay atm or comparing him to Gerard or others ,but this could be a slump and he is actually better than what he is right now .
Still think he can be a decent player ,probably not for us in the near future though
The same defense could be applied to Munir, but the hate he gets is magnified because he gets more opportunities (Not because he is worse) to screw up.
We'll see. I think by the time Sandro's 23 I feel he'll be a top player, maybe not Barca level but that's a privilege for the born geniuses. As for the Lallana comparison, I'm coming from the premise, 1 goal in 33 games and not much else, that's it's difficult for him to be any worse.
23 seems like a pretty random number. Like Sport declaring Pique was going to leave to the MLS at 34. And your Lallana comparison is literally saying that
anybody could do a better job, and if that's really the case, why wouldn't Klopp opt for a striker who has actually shown something in the top flight of any league?
As someone said in epl Bojan is a star.
Enough said.
I recognize that Bojan is the perfect example of a failed La Masia forward, but even he was much better in the youth ranks and as an overall player than Sandro is/was. He actually had a role with the first team for a time as well because he was able to contribute to the team, something Sandro has not had despite all of the chances he's received. Maybe if he were to go to a bottom half EPL side he could prove me wrong, but to just throw out that he could walk into the starting XI of a team challenging for CL football is ridiculous, and not even the likes of Bojan or Deulofeu were able to do that.