AnfieldEd
I am Leg End
Concur with Silky on this one. Scholes was amazing in the 98-03 period -- the whole United midfield during that time was something very, very special.
You mean you concur with me
Concur with Silky on this one. Scholes was amazing in the 98-03 period -- the whole United midfield during that time was something very, very special.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTDN341r234&feature=player_embedded
What is the first "song" in this video?
Anyone?
Thanks.
(But you have scouser cooties, Ed. How'm I to know you won't steal my hubcaps while I'm concurring?!?!?)
so what's the point of this thread? Another overrated Brit compared to a talanted player?.
Yeah, yeah we had this before, certainly Scholes is better than Xavi, Beckham better than Iniesta, Nicky Butt better than Xabi Alonso, Lampard better than Iniesta, and Shearer better than Villa. That's why England from Scholes generation looked so amazing that can't beat any decent opponent. Giants!!
Why is it always other fans than Culés who compare players with each other. Everyone here knows very well that Xavi is above Scholes.
BTW: They can only be compared to each other if you only look at Scholes seasons from 2006-2011 where he started to play Xavis role. Before that he played a similar role as Messis does now (apart from the goals and obviously the enormous class Messi has compared to Scholes) right behind the two attackers. That is why he scored more goals. After he changed position he scores LESS goals than Xavi.
Xavi has won all he can win. Scholes no where near that level despite him being 5,5 years older. Based on 2006-2011 it really is a no contest. Period.
That said Scholes is a wonderful player but Xavi tops it all and is above everyone else (in the midfield) and has been for a long time now. Scholes was no where near that reputation. He has not been near the Ballon d'Or as well (and don't use that crap = because he is English) Bullshit IMO.
It's not a comparison thread. Read the opening post before talking out your arse, and you aint funny with your 'Butt better than Alonso and Stoke better than Barcelona' jokes, something this forum seems to find hilarious. Very juvenile.
See above.
By the way, anyone who says Scholes is overrated is a muppet of the highest order.
Shearer was better than Villa though tbf.
Find me a spaniard who thinks like you
DJ Fresh - Goldust, one of the vocal remixes i persume
Andres that is not the first "song" (the one that last 20 seconds before the Gold Dust starts). I just googled it. It does not start that way.
Alan was much better than Villa.
Stop repeating this to everyone like a retarded gramophone ffs - it's not a comparison thread blya blya blya, it's not a comparison thread ... it's not it's not... Shut it. Yeah even you couldn't explain what this thread is about, it's not my fault that you've got an intelligence of goat's scrotums, pumpkin. Xavi vs Scholes (but it's not a comparison thread). Yeah we've got it, professor, now I suppose we have to suck Scholes balls, otherwise we're kids who knows shit about football. As if Scholes played for the Faroe Islands. As if England and United are role models for modern, technical, attractive football. Yeah sure, this is my personal opinion, titso, so get it over already. Now go and cry me a river, because I think that England's players are overrated.