Sergi Roberto

Albo

New member
As RB Roberto's crosses are so much better than Dani's, but he is lacking the runs fullbacks do.
 

Alik

Moderator
I thought we've realised that Roberto is much better utilized in a more defensive role.

He's a much better DM and RB than he is CM.

He might even have done a better job at LB than Mathieu.


Rafinha should have been subbed in as CM. Because that's where we need him most.
 

evilhita666

Barçapocalypse NOW!
He improved a lot once the midfield was reorganized and like others have said before, his defensive capabilities seem to be more useful than his offensive game...
 

FC B

Senior Member
I totally don't get why he plays for Barca ! Why the fuck Lucho is pushing him to the first team that heavily ? The boy doesn't have nothing special, absolutely nothing to recommend him for a Barca player !

This is sick !!!
 

Galning

Moderator
Sergi Roberto still in first team, Samper, Halilovic, Denis Suarez etc. not even close. Lol at football sometimes.
 

Behrox

Vice President of FC Barcelona
it was Lucho's fault sending him in place of Iniesta when it was Rafa who should have come back into midfield and Sandro subbed on for Iniesta. It is and should be established that he is a much better defensive and deep lying player than a forward attacking one.
 
F

Flavia

Guest
it was Lucho's fault sending him in place of Iniesta when it was Rafa who should have come back into midfield and Sandro subbed on for Iniesta. It is and should be established that he is a much better defensive and deep lying player than a forward attacking one.

The problem is he is not good enough to play against top opposition. Just against minions. Our midfield is too thin until Arda can play. And I think one more player is needed too.
 

Behrox

Vice President of FC Barcelona
The problem is he is not good enough to play against top opposition. Just against minions. Our midfield is too thin until Arda can play. And I think one more player is needed too.

double pivot + Roberto meant we were playing essentially with a 3 man DM midfield which was just begging Sevilla to come at us and they did with full force. That is a big mistake. Roberto should only sub Busi and if need be Rakitic, not Iniesta
 
F

Flavia

Guest
double pivot + Roberto meant we were playing essentially with a 3 man DM midfield which was just begging Sevilla to come at us and they did with full force. That is a big mistake. Roberto should only sub Busi and if need be Rakitic, not Iniesta

Rafinha had cramps a few moments later. Roberto would need to be subbed in regardless. And that's the problem. Our bench is thin and weak.
 

God Serena

New member
Rafinha had cramps a few moments later. Roberto would need to be subbed in regardless. And that's the problem. Our bench is thin and weak.

Starting Rafinha from the beginning was a poor decision. He'd have been a great sub for the midfield and, let's be honest here, there was no real logic behind playing him as a winger and benching Pedro. If Lucho was punishing Pedro for leaving Sandro at the very least should have started. Lucho's lineup backed us into a corner from the beginning and made our bench look even weaker than it was. Rafa is our only viable sub for Iniesta or Rakatic but when he's already tired we're essentially forced to play Roberto.

Taking Rafinha off for Bartra for a poor sub though, imo. Should have been Sandro. The double pivot never works and it neutered our chances of getting another goal. Luckily Messi is a bit of a God and Pedro gave it 110% when subbed on.
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top