Cule Angles
Visca el filòsof!
I'm not diverting anything i'm just trying to make a point.Its perfectly relevant, Fifa are the governing body of football their role in a nutshell is to govern.Instead of wasting time on banning players for diving, or placing transfer bans clubs for poaching when the details are a bit foggy.
Its not only football schools that are plundered especially in West Africa, where the need is more.Take Micheal Essien for example, his mother was a street hawker in Ghana selling bread on the road side making 5 Cedi's( £1.50 ) at the end of everyday with five children to feed at home.If you were told by a French scout that your child has talent, he wants to take him to Europe, with the possibility of playing for a european football team would you say no? When the kids dumped on the streets, who's the bread seller gonna complain to, FIFA? Hardily.
FIFA need to focus on the developing football policy in countries where the laws for these things are unclear, they need to focus on the countries where doing these things are easier to get away with.Where there is no system besides getting a visa and jumping on a plane.
So your point is that Michael Essien should still be selling bread on Ghanaian streets? Of course you're diverting from the point in question, you're claiming that because the French clubs are in some way imperfect they are undeserving of justice in this scenario. That's not how it works, English clubs have broken rules and deserve to be hauled over the coals for it, whatever the French clubs have done it doesn't negate the illegality of Chelsea's actions nor does it mean that they shouldn't be punished. UEFA is absolutely right to try and uphold the integrity of youth academies and protect the interests of the clubs producing talented players.