Thiago was sold via release clause because it dropped from 90m to 25m because he wasn't playing 60% of the games.
Valdes leaving on his own terms is basically what I'm saying, not something Barca wanted. Alves neither. You might just count the latter 2 as a half, and then it's still 2-1 as Bayern really only ever sold Kroos, before that Ballack in 2006 was the last one.
The chances for Thiago to play to avoid his release clause dropping were there, but Tito didn't play him. Thiago held talks with Zubi before he left, Zubi didn't guarantee him anything which teams usually do to keep players. The intention to keep Thiago wasn't really there from the beginning. He was deemed surplus to requirements since we had Xavi, Iniesta and Cesc. Poor planning rather than losing a player against our will. Didn't want Valdes to leave, sure, that's right.
We renewed Alves with that clause put in. We knew he would or could exercise that to leave on free. All in all, only Valdes left against our own will.
- Thiago left because we didn't seem to count on him
- We were prepared to move on from Alves anyway had it not been for the transfer ban
- Valdes was the one who left when we wanted him to stay
1-1 or 1-2 if you want to count Ballack or 2-2 if you want to count Thiago and Ballack from both sides.
Why not agree on that neither team really loses players they want to keep?