Müller: Fundamentally this is hard to answer. For San Marino this match, playing against the world champions, is a highlight. From us a win is expected, which is perfectly clear. We have completely different means. You could definitely raise the concern, that there's a certain risk to a match like this on a grimy/sleazy pitch like todays - even though it looked fine at the start - and with an opponent with a certain playstyle, which perhaps isn't necessary. The romanticist says: Matches like this are part of it, for the small countries. On the other hand it's very cumbersome, when you have to deal with a playstyle like this. And I do understand the San Marinese. They always looked at me. They have to run the clock down, so it doesn't end up... they did everything in their means, but this didn't have much to do with professional football. That's difficult to decide.
If this is what he actually said, still pretty bad in my opinion. If he knows it is part of the game and especially for smaller countries this is big, why complaining (regardless of whether he was asked by the press or not)?
Also, what did KHR actually say? I am interested in finding out. He has been complaining about NT schedule for a long time, hasn't he? The thing is, Buli teams play less games compared to their La Liga and EPL counterparts, and Bayern already has a grip on the league title already, what is he complaining about?
Don't see what's supposedly bad about this. He gives light on both perspectives: He points out that those games are a great event for fans of minows, but also says that on the other hand from the perspective of the athletes these fictures are stressful and poise unnecessary injury risks. He's being completely rational there, you see players and coaches complaining about their schedule everywhere. Call that a "complaint" but he's simply voicing a very popular opinion among players, yet he still didn't ask to be dropped from that game which shows his professional additude, despite his unhappyness.
What I meant was why complaining about playing these games in the first place? Those minnows are equal parts of FIFA as much as the bigger countries, why shouldn't they be playing these games? If the big teams don't like the schedule they can just field their bench and reserve players since there is no suspense as to the outcome of the game anyway. What he says really smacks of condescension as if San Marino shouldn't have had the opportunity to play against Germany at all.
As to KHR, my point is why is he constantly complaining about the schedule while others from other teams and leagues have not? The other teams are equally susceptible to injuries just like Bayern does.
The games also add to the fatigue of B-teamers. We're talking about germanys nationalteam, their subs are all first team players in their clubs with few exceptions. Same with Spain, France, Italy, England etc. Müller speaks on behalf of all of them, not just himself. He never said San Marino shouldn't have the opportunity to play such games, this is part of the misunderstanding that he later corrected.
Aren't you basically saying that the big teams such as Germnay, Spain, France, Italy etc. should NOT be playing the minnow teams? Isn't that what Mueller was implying? What misunderstanding then? If you treat these smaller countries as equals then you have to play them, right? What other solution do they suggest then? These minnows should have to play qualifiers for the qualifiers? Condescending, isn't it?
On KHR, I brought him up because it was in BBC's original report that he was fanning the flame of the Mueller controversy by allegedly saying "San Marino has nothing to do with professional football" while complaining about the NT schedule. Very poor taste and poor judgement if he indeed said that (I was asking earlier what he actually said as I wanted to make sure). If he wants to complain, at least show some class.
Ancelotti might leave at the end of the season if we are to believe some newspapers.