Tito responds to Guardiola's claims

[JamDav1982]

Here's the point I'm trying to make:

-We don't know what Rosell did to aggravate Pep in the first place
-We don't know what happened in New York between Tito and Pep, or the reasons as to why Pep couldn't visit much (which could've been on behalf of both sides)
-We don't know what Pep, Tito, or Rosell are trying to accomplish by saying these things

Yet despite all of these unknown variables you can so confidently come to the conclusion that Pep is the bad guy in all of this and that he should be accused for everything. And don't give me the whole "trying to get fair trial for both sides" story because clearly you are targeting and lashing out at Pep for this. You can't pretend you know the reasons behind it all or that the "evidence" is in your favor and anything else is speculation, because your reasoning is very much one sided and based on conspiracies. Whether or not people like Tito or Rosell is an entirely different matter and has to do with different things, but many of you are simply targeting Pep for this saga with Thiago and the press conferences with little basis and a lot of bitterness.

I think people are just commenting on Peps press conference and Titos response.

Pep comes off worse there and it was a planned attack on the Rosell and the club. Which seems to be based on something that is not even true.

Pep chose deliberately to make those comments at that point and Tito and the club have every right to respond, in fact they have to.

 

[beautifulgame]

It is true Pep made a planned attack. The man is calculated in every respect as any individual I've seen.

But tito and Rosell also plan theirs.

 

[DonAndres]

Given that the man is intelligent and calculated, there probably is a true reason behind his heated remarks, not a lie or something as dumb as "trying to cover up the Thiago transfer". He wouldn't make such comments on the club or Rosell out of thin air, something provoked him to.

 

[JamDav1982]

Given that the man is intelligent and calculated, there probably is a true reason behind his heated remarks, not a lie or something as dumb as "trying to cover up the Thiago transfer". He wouldn't make such comments on the club or Rosell out of thin air, something provoked him to.

Like what? Why would he not say what provoked him rather than bring up something that he could have at any point over the last six months?

He is in the wrong and has started a public war of words with the club on something he cant/wouldnt back up.

He is the one that brought this into the open and Barcelona HAD to respond and they did.

You seem desperate to stick up for Pep at all costs even when he starts some media shit that Mourinho would be proud of.

 

[DonAndres]

I'm not saying there's a "secret" reason for Pep saying that, but that he wouldn't be making those comments out of a bald faced lie just to "start some media shit".

 

[JamDav1982]

I'm not saying there's a "secret" reason for Pep saying that, but that he wouldn't be making those comments out of a bald faced lie just to "start some media shit".

So he can act like that as long as he has a reason. Even though it is a reason he does not tell us?

Just about all of what you are saying is based on your own assumptions.

He started it and was wrong the club responded as they should and had to.

 

[mac10]

i'm assuming that what's quoted on the barca website is watered down from what was said in the actual press conference? I didn't see it

 

[beautifulgame]

to be frank you are all being overly presumptuous.

too much conjecture in here, neither side has sufficient evidence to make claims about who is right and who is wrong or about motives.

 

[DonAndres]

I'm not saying he's right for it, I'm saying that you or anyone accusing him so confidently have very little basis as you don't know the situation. Pep hating off of a circumstance like this is very one sided thinking as if you know everything enough to say that Pep is wrong and the club was perfect about it all Really a lot of this came out of Tito having the last word in it, as many are are making up things about Pep being a heartless friend because he hasn't responded yet and this is as much of the story as they "know".

 

[DonAndres]

to be frank you are all being overly presumptuous.

too much conjecture in here, neither side has sufficient evidence to make claims about who is right and who is wrong or about motives.

I'm not assuming who's right, I'm just saying accusing Pep already is premature and bitter.

 

[beautifulgame]

I'm not assuming who's right, I'm just saying accusing Pep already is premature and bitter.

i mostly agree with your posts than anyone else in here.

i only disagree with your recent post that insinuate pep must have some sound reason. to that, i say we cannot know, i am inclined to think he does myself though based on what we know about how the people involved have acted previously but that is not enough to have an argument over it.

but generally, you were being fair in my opinion.

 

[sailor]

The real instigators of all this shit are Cruyff and Laporta. They've been monitoring the whole bazzard behind dark curtains. Not all what sparkles is gold !

 

[beautifulgame]

you are correct, the battle is between rosell and his close associates and laporta and his (one is cruyff) however Tito and Pep have both become victims and left fighting the battle.

not to say both don't have their own responsbility either, they are both clever men, especially pep.

 

[Flavia]

I'm not assuming who's right, I'm just saying accusing Pep already is premature and bitter.

Pep surely shouldn't had started this mess. He must have his reasons, but it still wasn't the right thing to do. And unfortunetely Tito followed him down that road, making the drama even worse. I really hope Pep won't respond again, or it will become even more sad than it already is.

 

[beautifulgame]

i agree flav