E
estranged
Guest
Your post is certainly more 'eye role' worthy than the one you quoted.
Cuz of Messi and all the success
Your post is certainly more 'eye role' worthy than the one you quoted.
Well, aren't you a little sunshine.
Point being, it seems the "All La Masia" has become more of an obsession among the fans and the desirable end in lieu of the means to maintain the competitiveness of our team.
Besides, paying top notch prices for the players above is still a crude reality, regardless of our current situation. The fact that memories stretch no further than 2008 on a number of occasions is becoming ever-frustrating. By this, I mean simply that we've only recently been able to achieve the coveted position of having both quality and a great amount of youth players contributing to the team at large.
Edit: emphasis added.
I'm not Plip but Ajax comes immediately to mind in terms of clubs with pedigree that use their own youth products. If you'd prefer to remain in the Iberian peninsula, the Athletic also comes to mind, with the additional self-imposed restrictions that the players from ITS academy are only from Euskal Herria.
To give you a hint about what I'm starting a thread on later, Both Barca and Athletic are guilty of the same thing - buying older teenagers from small nearby clubs for pennies and claiming them as their own. Not that scouting local talent is a crime, but the rhetoric used for political purposes is another story.
When you say 'Claiming them as their own' I'm guessing you mean as a 'youth product'.You could also mention virtually every club in Latin America, where with the exception of Brazil and Mexico, teams rarely have more than a handful of imports and use most of their limited resources on player development.
To give you a hint about what I'm starting a thread on later, Both Barca and Athletic are guilty of the same thing - buying older teenagers from small nearby clubs for pennies and claiming them as their own. Not that scouting local talent is a crime, but the rhetoric used for political purposes is another story.
When you say 'Claiming them as their own' I'm guessing you mean as a 'youth product'.
Juvenile A, Barcelona C, and even B Like it or not are a considered youth teams, And when talking about the latter one, It is more of a fact than a personal opinion, The ages you see in there is an enough proof i think.
You seem to propose a certain age limit where beyond it you're not permitted to call him a youth product, And i remember you making a similar remark about sergio, Well he came when he was 16, And you know that of course, So why 16 is your limit, Why not 15, 17 or 18 or even 19, What's so special about the age 16.
It was never an 'age' thing, It was about development, And sorry to say this, But you deliberately chose to miss this, When everyone one hears about a youth product, Or a la masia player, They just imagine a young, Obscure, Unknown player, that someday became a world class player playing for the first team, That's it, Because that's the whole idea and the fuss is about, It doesn't matter how old they were when they came, The desired outcome is the same.
Mike: it's not cynical, I'm just being realistic.
The fact that we've been able to enter into a period of growth both trophy and youth wise should be respected and cherished. But claiming that we've always been in such a position (many do) is short-sighted. When the Dream Team was crumbling we barely had any prospects that looked even half-decent in the B team. Both Xavi and Puyol were anomalies of their time, which led us to rely on players like Oleguer, Gerard Lopez and Gabri as our base.
Just saying that we have only recently had the luck to enjoy fully of the labour of our youth academy, and we should enjoy of it to its fullest. Not to the detriment of the team as a whole, however.
In terms of youth development Athletic, Ajax, River and Boca come to mind.
The idea of la masia is to 'nurture' talented young players, Allowing them to fulfill their full penitential, And use them in the future as a first team players, The club benefits in 2 ways:I'm going to expand on this later, but at the same time Alba, Cesc and Pique all left Barca at around the same age the likes of Busquets and Puyol were bought. Yet cules have a fit when Arsenal tries to take credit for Cesc. It's clear Barca has played a role in the trajectory of every one of these players, but it's the hypocrisy and attempt to moralize it I have a problem with. If you wanted to you could argue even some expensive signings like Ronaldinho were "made" by Barca considering they only reached their peak on this team.
Barca's youth academy right now is one of the best in the world, if not the best. But this team doesn't have some sort of moral authority for it, and it's important to acknowledge the role expensive imports have and continue to play on Barcelona. I remember when Madrid had more homegrown players than Barca did; these things often come in cycles and since both clubs are too rich to fade away, there will be a time where the roles are once again reversed.
Mike: it's not cynical, I'm just being realistic.
The fact that we've been able to enter into a period of growth both trophy and youth wise should be respected and cherished. But claiming that we've always been in such a position (many do) is short-sighted. When the Dream Team was crumbling we barely had any prospects that looked even half-decent in the B team. Both Xavi and Puyol were anomalies of their time, which led us to rely on players like Oleguer, Gerard Lopez and Gabri as our base.
Just saying that we have only recently had the luck to enjoy fully of the labour of our youth academy, and we should enjoy of it to its fullest. Not to the detriment of the team as a whole, however.
In terms of youth development Athletic, Ajax, River and Boca come to mind.
Barca's youth academy right now is one of the best in the world, if not the best. But this team doesn't have some sort of moral authority for it, and it's important to acknowledge the role expensive imports have and continue to play on Barcelona. I remember when Madrid had more homegrown players than Barca did; these things often come in cycles and since both clubs are too rich to fade away, there will be a time where the roles are once again reversed.