serghei
Senior Member
Few things here:
1-This are gross spending, with transfer market reported money with you approximating numbers to the higher ends, and transfermarket actually include all add-ons in the deal.
The number accurately then is 593.55M gross spending including add-ons. That happened through 7 years (7 summers + 7 winyer transfer markets).
2-This means around 85M per years (slightly less actually).
We have already spent 65M of those, and most likely we will spend far more than 20M in summer. So Xavi is put in better financial situation than Klopp tbh.
3-Also Barca is in better situation than Liverpool was in that year Klopp arrived in almost everything, and most of those deals happened in time that had football highest inflation rate. 65M for Torres is actually closer to VVD deal than Alison one IMO.
4-We have no City, Chelsea, United to compete with both financially and in the league , Atletico financial power is closer to Spurs than any of the above.
5- So domestically at least, Barca should never be in situation of waiting 3 or 4 years, never mind Liverpool was in CL final 2018, that is like 2024 for Xavi.
6-Klopp had 2 things for him, history and willingness to not lead the sporting project, the guy wanted Brandt over Salah and he conceded that the SD knew better. Xavi insisting on leading the project and having himself included in everything, the moment the project goes south he should be the one getting the axe because the club can't afford even more decline
Same way that if the club have success, he should be the one who takes enormous amount of credit, just like he did in our good run prior to fifa virus
I will come back to this later, but for now I renume to saying the pre-Klopp Liverpool side was close to winning EPL with Brendan.
Rubbish to say that version of Liverpool even without Suarez was in worse shape than the Amigo Barca carcass without money, without any of the best attackers in Messi, Suarez and Grizemann, and struggling to even register some signings.
I am giving you examples with the kind of money that is needed to fund a top class team and you give me some secondary and tertiary arguments, most of which I repeated myself in the past.
I agree with some of your points, but you should also agree that to compete with the best you need massive investment. That is priority 1, right next to the manager and the technical staff being on the money with their decision making. Any part of these ground zero priorities is not up to par, and you will never achieve what you set out to do.
It's just that simple. Xavi being bad, money being low, technical director being unispired, Laporta not getting it together, any of those even on their own could torpedo the project and stall it for many years, United style or even worse.
Last edited: