ajnotkeith
Senior Member
In number yes but of much less quality than theirs, if we have only 0.72 xG from 12 shots and 6 on target, it means they were not good chances.So we did have way more chances
In number yes but of much less quality than theirs, if we have only 0.72 xG from 12 shots and 6 on target, it means they were not good chances.So we did have way more chances
How many chances barca had?Essentially they actually created more than we did despite our supposed domination.
Clown manager.
Our best chances are the goal (0.14), that Lewa shot that Maret saved (0.10), Gundogan shot (0.9), that Gundogan miss in the extra time (0.10) and the rest is bellow 0.10.So we did have way more chances
Its unclear just in what form Xavi thinks we dominated the game, as it is not at all clear.
I don't even agree with that tbh. We were the better team on the ball up to the 60th minute and then we couldn't get out of our half after that.He thinks we dominated possession, circulated the ball, and entered deep areas.
To be fair, we did most of that, and Napoli were not threatening at all on the break, besides Osimen's goal, which was an individual fumble.
But Xavi doesn't understand that if you don't create good chances, you are not winning games just by circulating ball. Our play in the final third was poor
Kilt? I think you have me confused with Jamdav.Had I known we’d go for Xavi, I would’ve been a regular at the Koelt parties. You had those, right? In my kilt.
Saved me the time.I don't even agree with that tbh. We were the better team on the ball up to the 60th minute and then we couldn't get out of our half after that.
Napoli 49% ball, Barca 51%... Their 30 minutes at the end kind of outweighed everything we did.