Absolutely everyone that watched Pele live said the same thing to me - physically he was a beast and that very much complimented his tehnical capabilites. So I ask you this - don`t you think that that "beast" would be much faster and more physically powerful today, with modern training methods? I am pretty sure that he would be.
Well, yes we don't necessarily need to agree on everything...
I think Pele wasn't the most skillful player of his time, he was just an outstandingly great combination of all possible individual capabilities. One could hardly mention anything he wouldn't have been great in or well above average.
At the same time I think that if he would be trained at Santos or Botafogo today, he would be much better physically, would have much more capacitance and counteraction, but would be still a bit slow for today's standards. Players like Messi, Neymar, Marcello, or even Di Maria, etc. have better techniques and speed. Ronaldinho was much better in skills than Pele was...
If I`m not mistaken you were a pro player, so I think you can agree with me that football training today is at a much higher level than it was back then. It would be interesting to hear about football training back then.
Training is on a higher level for sure, but the most important things simply cannot be taught. Outstanding skill can't be taught, those can be practiced and practiced to be used in conjunction with less obvious skills. In my time we were running a lot in training but running with the ball? Way less compared to the today's standards.
Training was very different back then...
- no training the forthcoming day following a game... - only some swimming or sauna (!)
- no gym exercises for the upper body
- very few flexibility exercises for the joints, so folks often got injured when trying to handle a high ball with their feet
- running too often 100m or 60m - full speed - but much less medium-speed runs
- too much 10km runs in slow speed
- half of the players still used to smoke...
I can go on for three pages more...
If he was technically weaker than Messi, it is by a very small margin. I can`t agree that Messi is much better than him in that regard. Messi is a monster, he can do everything with the ball and his dribbles are out of this world. But the same thing could be said for Maradona. Cruijff too.
We disagree here, sorry. Maradona was great but Messi is much better, and better being half as aggressive.
Also, as far as I recall Maradona could do exactly what you say about Messi - influence the whole game. Cruijff especially.
Influencing the game back then - to me subjectively - is something that Beckenbauer or Zico did more. But talking about influence, how about Iniesta?