So take Alisson, Thiago, Marquinhos and Tite out and they wouldn't be the same team? Ah great insight. Brazil were mediocre, but under Tite they've rarely created much and they play quite a comfortable possession football which has been completely impossible to play with the field conditions and was seen last night.
Can you read or are you more worried about writing one-liners?
I wrote Alisson and one of either Thiago Silva or Marquinhos. In other words I gave 2 examples of players that make the main difference between the two teams. In other words there is not such a big difference between those two teams quality wise or in practice (as the results of the past many tournaments also confirms) as made out to be which was also confirmed yesterday. Both are not very impressive teams at all.
Me mentioning Tite, if you had read my previous post just above the one that you quoted, was a reference to the importance of having had a talented manager with clear ideas rather than changing coaches 100 times as Argentina have been doing lately. So yes, if Brazil had an incompetent federation (as incompetent as I know that the Brazilian federation has not been much better hence the very bad Brazilian results in the past 10+ years) as the Argentinian one and changed managers as frequently as Argentina has been doing, they would have similar struggles as Argentina despite an even greater abundance of talent. Significantly greater in fact.
Tite's tactics and playing style is a carbon copy of his Corinthians team. A pragmatic manager yet with clear ideas and who is interested in taking the control of a game while having a great emphasis on the defense. Which has showed in this tournament as Brazil is yet to concede a single goal in 5 games.
Nobody can tell what the hell Scaloni's sporting project, defined playing style etc. is about and hardly any manager would have been able to implement anything in such a chaotic environment (and such little time and so few games) hence my previous post about the enormous importance of a long-term sporting project, distinctive playing style, vision, competent manager and federation etc. which you seem to have missed completely. Rather you focused on a small part of my post that was about names/players to make it easier for some users to understand what my point was of those examples.
As for the state of the pitches, you don't need to tell me that, I wrote about it already and anyone who saw just 1 game during the tournament, could attest to the horrible state of the stadiums. That in itself is just a confirmation of how far behind Copa América is compared to the regular EURO tournament. Not even going to talk about the referees, the level of the teams or the dull atmosphere at the stadiums.