So were they panic buys or did we want them before as well? That is kind of contradictory.
This is what I wanted to say.
Currently we are interested in:
1. Dybala
2. Verratti
3. Arthur
4. Eriksen
5. Thiago
6. Goretzka
So, those are players whom we would like to see in our shirt one day.
But, in this moment, we either don't need them either because we are covered in that position or because those players are too expensive.
And imagine that Coutinho starts to play awesome soon in Iniesta's position.
And then PSG steals him for 200-300M (a random example).
And then, we just go out and buy Goretzka for 100M and Thiago for 250M instead of Coutinho.
And 6 Months later we figure out that Goretzka is not as good as expected.
And that he is not suitable for our style at all.
Or that Thiago is not as good fit as a CAM like Coutinho.
This is an analogy with Dembele.
We surely DID follow him since he was an interesting player.
But if Neymar stayed here, we surely wouldn't buy him, since he wouldn't be able to play with MSN in our team.
Coutinho, we also wanted him, but who knows whether we would pay 100, 120 or 160M for him if Neymar didn't leave?
In that sense, my impression is still that Dembele was a panic buy.
It is not as if we didn't follow him.
But he looked like a next big thing in that moment, he was a flavor of a month/of a season and it was: either Dybala (a horrible fit also) or Dembele as our next winger.
And we needed to buy someone right away because Barto would get sacked by angry fans and socios (Real Madrid winning 3 CLs and Neymar-the-future leaving us).
I don't understand it either. There were those of us who could see these problems, and it's not just one game, coming from a mile away.
BBZ has gone from advocating hard for the flailing workhorse system to now wanting taller, stronger strikers who can head the ball. He's even gone as far as saying he will never forgive Guardiola for what he has done to Barcelona. It would appear he has gone off the reservation list.
If we played 433 yesterday with Messi-Dembele-Suarez, we would probably lose 3:0, like always.
Evolved Barca is better than a current 442.
But 442 is still way better longterm than 433 where our midfield and defense get exposed and we often look like little kids against men.
If you think that yesterday's match was a disaster, better look back how we played with 433:
Our attack was equally as sterile as in 442 (due to playing trhough the middle and on the ground all the time against 2 buses around the opponent's box).
While our defense and midfield's stability is way better in 442 and we allow less shots and counters.
So, my opinion is still that we would lose 3:0 or 3:1 with 433, while we can survive with 0:1, 1:0 or 1:1 with 442:
If Msn couldn't create anything for the last 2 years, why do you think that suddenly a rookie kid Dembele would help in our creative department against those big teams?
What, Dembele is suddenly better than Neymar?
Take a look at the last two "adventures" with 433.
Streile, sterile, sterile.
Attacking through the middle and being unable to break a bus of 10 players around the box with our shortpasses (what a surprise...).