Please, keep going. I love to see El Trencaxarxes giving stats and solid arguments against a 14yo troll and a guy who uses FIFA stats as a scientific proof. It's absolutely fascinating.
Personal insults again.
That says a lot about your arguments.
Also, this is fun lately, whoever doesn't like someone's favorite player is: a troll or a RM fan.
Regarding El Trencax's stats, lol. He used only attacking stats, which shows that Dembele is one of the best creators in our team, no shit Sherlock.
Who are his opponents?
Suarez who can't play a simple pass?
Rakitic a babysitter?
Arthur, who is learning currently how to play a forward pass here and there?
A pivot Busi?
Semedo with 0 assists in 2 years for Barca?
Basically, his only opponents are Messi and Coutinho.
Can I use similar stats showing that Adama is the best dribbler?
Or how awesome Paulinho is due to a ratio of shooting attempts vs goals scored ratio.
Or how Semedo has 0 assists at Barca in 2 seasons, which is a truly amazing achievement.
A short info: we have learned over the years that we can do anything with stats.
We can twist them in any possible way.
I have done it 100s of times, the same as 100s of other guys, to fit their agenda.
It is hard to be too objective when you love/hate some players or EV.
I can use SOME stats to show how Messi is indisputable best in everything.
Or I can cherry pick stats showing how he was below his standard in CL knockout games since 2013 and in knockout games on world cups.
Anyone can turn Suarez into a best goalscorer ever for Barca, using SOME stats.
Or, we can make him look like shit with cherry picking stats from CL knockout games.
Cr7 can be better than Messi or way weaker than Messi, based on which stats do you cherry pick.
Saying how Dembele, as a winger is one of our most dangerous players is equal to throwing stats how Pique and Umtiti are among our players with the highest number of tackles and interceptions.
And that should show how Pique is actually good, right?
If we would have the same team and Adama instead of Dembele, Adama would be in top 2-3 players involved in a highest amount of dangerous situations in attack.
If we would have Deulofeu instead of Dembele, the same.
Of course that he would have been among the top3-4 also.
And wait, now since Deulofeu has more goals/key passes/dribbles/assists than Rafinha or some midfielder, that is a proof how Deulofeu/Dembele have to play?
Well, it depends what a coach needs.
I have said a lot of times: we already have (in majority of matches) enough of attacking power even with 4 midfielders plus Messi and Suarez.
Newsflash: nobody is denying that Dembele is good in attack.
A problem are: his IQ, not being fit to our team, a lack of chemistry with teammates, bad defending, weird positioning and off the ball movement, questionable work ethic.
Ask your mate to use stats about those things.
About my FIFA scientific proven facts, can you find stats which will show that Dempele isn't the worst defender in a current Barca's team and who is sometimes painful to watch when he is trying to close down an opponent.
If I am making mistakes in my post, forgive me, mate.
I am still only 14.
For the end, how to not add some trolling and harsher words in posts after a post like yours.