Transfer money from a sale is a purchase agreement, irrespective of the terms of the player’s contract or length, so not at all the same thing
And as it is for the use of a portion of VIP boxes over 10 seasons, reasonable to consider the gains spread out over the length of those terms
Will have to wait until details come out as I see now there are conflicting reports on deal terms & scope, on whether it is a sponsorship deal vs VIP box rental. This makes it pretty clear the 1:1 has to be validated
Similar logic to term it a lever when Laporta profits the club from renting out VIP boxes yet when Perez does it it’s great business
The shrewdness of Laporta here is that Tebas has to validate it as this is how it was interpreted for Perez and their deal at BernaLeo