24 - Thomas Vermaelen

raki

New member
If it's an option, I don't see how it can be obligatory?

There are 2 kind of options: mandatory or not. The 2nd is the most used.

Chelsea sold Papy Djabolodje to Sunderland for 9.5M. A player who played 50 seconds Chelsea...The best we can do with Vermaelen is a loan...


Free players or loans... HORRIBLE SELLING
 

DonAK

President of FC Barcelona
It was rumored in Italy that Roma wanted him on a loan for 3m with a mandatory signing for 8m at the end. I guess something to do with FFP.
 

Trickykid

Active member
Somehow I've always seen this being used. 'Obligatory buy-option', 'Obligatory option to buy' etc....

An option itself is a right, but not an obligation. Not sure if it's the footballing world playing with words and adopted this term or something else, but as far as I can remember, I've always read and heard it.

Obligatory signing clause would be more apt I guess.

I can't imagine this is the case, sadly. Roma should be smart enough to try him out for a season before they risk a permanent deal.
 

DonAK

President of FC Barcelona
Yes. That's why he didn't play today either. Didn't want to risk him getting injured and ruining the deal lol
 

Raketa10

Senior Member
If we loaned him for one season than we are biggest idiots ever! It is eather sell or no deal. This is beyend stupid!!! I simply can not believe that we will accept loan without mandatory buy clause. Who does that with 31 year old player?
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top