Gazzznigga
Active member
No reasonable or rational person doubted.
4 - Ronald Araújo
- Thread starter xXKonan
- Start date
JamDav1982
Senior Member
He was not man marking Alvarez then.. he was pressuring him on the ball as alternative is to let him get on it and run at you which would not be zonal defending.
Gazzznigga
Active member
Presurring and following an attacker into his half far away from your zone while zone marking....? 😆 🤣 😂 😆 🤣 😂...keyboard footbal analysis...
So you could follow an attacker to his 16 yard box while still zone marking? 🤔
What is zonal marking then?
Wow!....some comments here.... just pure comedy... lol
So you could follow an attacker to his 16 yard box while still zone marking? 🤔
What is zonal marking then?
Wow!....some comments here.... just pure comedy... lol
Last edited:
JamDav1982
Senior Member
Yes.. because no player ever will be expected to stick to zonal or man marking in situations it is weaker for the team if they do.
Not how it works.
It would be absolutely moronic if Alvares drifts into Aruajos area and looks for ball and Araujo cant go with him.
Araujo was not told to man mark anyone tonight other than picking up Sorloth more at set pieces.
Gazzznigga
Active member
😆 🤣 😂...even more comedic.
It is either you use zonal marking or you man mark. simple. No sane coach will confuse his players to mix those two at their discretion.
Araujo was brought on to neutralise Sorloth for pace, late runs and all other threats aerial threats Araujo began warming up as soon as Sorloth came on at the beginning of the 2nd half. It ws for a reason.
That explains a few instances where Inigo was on the right defending runs while Araujo went with Sorloth as he drofted to the left. Go and watch it again(between minute 78th to 85th). You cant be doing zonal and be switching zones unless your coach asks you to switch positions for tactical reasons....it is a recipe for disaster
This is not the first time he has been used for that role. He waa morpopular r for man marking Vinicius as a right back under Xavi in the el classicos.
Last edited:
JamDav1982
Senior Member
You are chatting utter nonsense as per usual and have absolutely no clue what watching or what a 'man marking' set up means.
He absolutely was not sent on to 'man mark' anyone.
Not how Flick sets up his defence and him going with Alvarez doesnt change that.. it is not something players are tied to either way.
You have no clue.
He absolutely was not sent on to 'man mark' anyone.
Not how Flick sets up his defence and him going with Alvarez doesnt change that.. it is not something players are tied to either way.
You have no clue.
ElMagodel304
Member
I dont trust him at all, brainfarts man. I'd switch him with Huijsen + 30M.
JamDav1982
Senior Member
Of course not.. there is zero chance Araujo was told to go on and man mark anyone.
To think you cant go with players in situations it is better to do that unless playing a 'man marking' set up is pure delusion.
Flick would go fucking ballistic if Araujo or example lets Alvarez drop off him and turn with ball and run at the back four and Araujo says 'but boss I am not playing a man marking role'.
Utter nonsense
If the midfield are there and Alarez drops Araujo wont go with him.. as clearly didnt when watch game.
Gazzznigga
Active member
😆 🤣....all of your clues can still not explain why he followed Sorloth on occasions he drifted left
JamDav1982
Senior Member
Because at times you have to pick up players.... as Barca do same every single game when required... but dont play a man marking set up.
Get a clue what you are watching.
Gazzznigga
Active member
😆 🤣.....utter nonsense. The more you type your gibberish the clearer it gets to me that you don't have an idea of what you are spouting.
At first it was pure zonal marking and then it was a mix of zonal marking and following Sorloth and now it is a specific Flick's system.....absolute rubbish.
I have also read other comments about Araujo not sticking to Sorloth gor why it was not man marking..... laughable too.
Man marking does not connote being glued to a player athrough gh and through. It only means you keep the particular player you are assigned in your soght always and be the first responder to his threats. That was what Araujo did exactly. Anyone who played soccer to a reasonable level can attest to this.
A quck check on online highlights of Araujo in todays match will reveal that much. He was brought in for Sorloth, just as the la liga 4-2 win, simple. He was the first responder to his threats.
Your very stupid explanation that Curbasi was taken out because of one bad pass is enough to see through your shallow knowledge here.
Gazzznigga
Active member
.... 😆 🤣 😂 above is an example of what this clown refers to whenever he mentions "clues".
Suggesting that Flick took Curbasi off for a bad pass has to be the best "clue" from an "online intelligensia wannabe" . It makes it seem like Flick looks out for errors and punishes the player by pulling him out immediately. ... 😆 🤣. Asinine nonsense!!
Few days ago this same online Jabroni wrote that Curbasi was far ahead of Araujo for his passing skills but here he claims same Curbasi was pulled out for an Araujo (he deemed extremely terrib6le for his poor passing skills) because Curbasi made 1 wrong pass...ironic. Flick must have bees fiddling with his brains like his... 😆 🤣 😂
Araujo was brought in to extinguish the threats from Sorloth...be the first responder to all his runs, positioning and aerial balls. Same application as was made last time Barca played Athletico(4-2 win). As soon as Sorloth was brought in late into the 2nd half, Araujo.was introduced by Flick with one instruction...."go after Sorloth" and neutralise his threats. He must have learnt from the 2-1 loss at Montjuic in December.
Last edited:
Gazzznigga
Active member
This should have been enough warning for me to have seen that to engage you in any argument and expect anything less infantile would have been a mirsculous feat. I should have quietly noticed how many here quietly avoid your posts that you spread across many topics and view you with same much contempt many have warned us all of. It should have been a silent treatment ti allow you think you have win ans wallow in more ignominy.
How could an adult allow the above to pass through his brain, talkmore of typing it out to an online forum?
Just saw this now. If I had seen this earlier, I would never have engaged you this far.
My apologhes bro, your level of reasoning is in the gutters of foolery. I am afraid you are too experienced in that level of buffoonery that you will defeat me easily with experience. I concede to you. 😆 🤣 😂
Last edited:
companyofcules
Well-known member
Did a great job this time, because it was a more tactical friendly game and the ref was very much allowing contacts.
Home of Barca Fans
