7 - Ferran Torres

[jamrock]

Potential on fifa is 90, same as fati for this guy, guess alot of people in football rate him.

 

[Devils]

Potential on fifa is 90, same as fati for this guy, guess alot of people in football rate him.

I’m pretty sure there was FIFA games where Andre Gomes had a potential of like 85 or something like that.

 

[jamrock]

I?m pretty sure there was FIFA games where Andre Gomes had a potential of like 85 or something like that.

🤦

 

[CatalinR10]

Imagine Leeds go down and Raphinha is available for 20m and want to join......

Then Xavi requests for Dani Olmo instead

I thought Raphinha is available all the time for 20 mil ?

 

[Joan]

I thought Raphinha is available all the time for 20 mil ?

Just if Leeds go down

 

[FinBarcelonafan]

When we will be hapoy with our scouting and trabafer targets?

Raphinha is too good of a market opportunity to miss and he does have a bit of upside. 25mil is cheap.

 

[FinBarcelonafan]

I?m pretty sure there was FIFA games where Andre Gomes had a potential of like 85 or something like that.

Must have come from the Bdor clause Barto put

Hahahahahaha

 

[delancey]

Since the winter transfer window:

Ferran Torres
22 matches played
7 goals
6 assists


Vlahovic
17 matches played
7 goals
2 assists

 

[CatalinR10]

Ferran Torres
22 matches played
7 goals
6 assists

Vlahovic
17 matches played
7 goals
2 assists

you mean this year or last months or ?


Vlahovic has 27 goals and 6 assists this season so far.

 

[delancey]

you mean this year or last months or ?


Vlahovic has 27 goals and 6 assists this season so far.

Since the winter transfer window.

 

[Birdy]

Since the winter transfer window:

Ferran Torres
22 matches played
7 goals
6 assists


Vlahovic
17 matches played
7 goals
2 assists

Is this supposed to show that Ferran is OK?

The real numbers (21-22 season):
Ferran] 0.31 non-penalty goals/90 min while having 0.51 non-pen xG/90 min
Conversion rate = 60%
Underperforming his xG by 40%

Vlahovic 0.58 non-penalty goals/90 min while having 0.1 non-pen xG/90 min
Conversion rate = 140%
Overperforming his xG by 40%

So, no they don't have comparable numbers at all

 

[Iniesta Ultra]

Is this supposed to show that Ferran is OK?

The real numbers (21-22 season):
Ferran] 0.31 non-penalty goals/90 min while having 0.51 non-pen xG/90 min
Conversion rate = 60%
Underperforming his xG by 40%

Vlahovic 0.58 non-penalty goals/90 min while having 0.1 non-pen xG/90 min
Conversion rate = 140%
Overperforming his xG by 40%

So, no they don't have comparable numbers at all

How did you calculate Vlahovic's conversion rate? .58 is 580% higher than .1, not 140%, which would mean he's overperforming by 480% which seems quite phenomenal if correct.

 

[Birdy]

How did you calculate Vlahovic's conversion rate? .58 is 580% higher than .1, not 140%, which would mean he's overperforming by 480% which seems quite phenomenal if correct.

Conversion rate is Goals scored/xGoals
Then the % of over/underperformance is a different question.
You might be right, I simply subtracted from 100%

But it still remains simply speaking that Ferran puts in only 6 out of 10 goals he should score, while Vlahovic puts in 14 out of 10 goals he should score

 

[Iniesta Ultra]

But it still remains simply speaking that Ferran puts in only 6 out of 10 goals he should score, while Vlahovic puts in 14 out of 10 goals he should score

I'm shocked Tosser's conversion rate's 60%, from all the sitters he's missed would've thought closer to 40%.

 

[fergus90]

Going to Juventus under Allegri was a bad decision for Vlahovic. Has to feed off scraps.