For someone who claims to have read the report you are missing the point.
I'll dumb it down for you though. You can thank me later.
Para 182. which is based on Evra's testimony the linguistic experts found the phrase that Evra accuses Suarez of saying to be "slightly unusual" and that perhaps another phrase would have been more appropriate to use if Suarez had intended racism. Interestingly, the panel seemed to ignore this aspect of the experts view.
Para 191 which is based on Suarez's testimony the linguistic experts found the use of the phrase "por que, negro?" sounds right linguistically and culturally. In para 190 and i quote "in Rioplatense Spanish the use of "negro" as described here by Mr Suarez would not be offensive".
So you can throw away the argument that his usage of the word negro is enough to convict him because the proper experts (i.e. not you) concluded para 194 "if Mr Suarez used the word "negro" as described by Mr Suarez, this would not be interpreted as either offensive or offensive in racial terms in Uruguay and Spanish-speaking America".
Suarez was basically convicted on one man's word i.e. that Evra's account of events were correct even though in a crowded penalty box no one caught Suarez using the word "negro" in a racist manner even though he it is alleged he said it a number of times.
That is a miscarriage of justice right there and any reasonable human being would see it a such.
we've been through this already.
Suarez's witnesses using Spanish and Dutch both say he told them he said 'because you are black' was my retort.
the fact that no one next to them heard what they said to eachother does not mean it did not happen.
you also ignore paragraph 197. "Of course, they wished to rely on different parts of the report to support their case. The FA
relied, in particular, on the experts' conclusion that if Mr Suarez used the words "negro"
and "negros" as described by Mr Evra, this would be understood as offensive and
offensive in racial terms in Uruguay and Spanish-speaking America more generally. The
physical gesture of touching Mr Evra's arm would also, in the context of the phrases used,
be interpreted as racist."
and no he was not convicted on 1 mans word, he was convicted by his own admission he used the word, and by 2 of his liverpool colleagues who both translated from Spanish and Dutch that Suarez said 'because you are black'.
