According to @porteranunez a few days ago Xavi picked Pjanic over Collado.
Strange because he was almost bragging to the media about how Xavi wanted him and he'd come back to the first team after his last game with Granada. Good luck for wherever he'll go.
If he couldn't get into the team last season when we had 0 options there wasn't any chance he would get into it now, like you said, just not at the level.Xavi might have wanted to have a look at him in pre-season, but it was never going to work out. He's simply not good enough. Not sure how Xavi and/or Collado didn't realize that before now.
Apparently the loan deal we made with Elche gives them 20% of a future sale for some reason...?
Why are we paying other clubs to take OUR players on loan? We already did this with Trincao and Wolves ended up making a few millions from it. Incompetence or some kind of accounting trick (though I can't see how)?
Really strange deal again.
Not sure how that works, could it be if a team wants him in January? Also works as an incentive for Elche to develop him I guess.
Incompetence would be if the clause was in place even after the loan ended. Say we sell him in August, no way Elche gets money for that.
You sure about that? I'm not.
Would understand your first point if he would turn out a starter for Elche and had a storming first half of the season (ofc not happening) and we'd get a 10m+ offer from a third club in January and decide to cash on him then would be fair to compensate Elche for losing a key player during the season.
But if they barely play him this season and we sell him for 1m next summer then why should they get anything? It's not like being there would help his development or increase his value.
Not to mention IIRC we're also paying bigger part if not his full wages this season as well so as [MENTION=29831]ajnotkeith[/MENTION] said it's really a strange deal.