Garrus
New member
Your argument is invalidI think his style might be even more worse than Dani's
Your argument is invalidI think his style might be even more worse than Dani's
u can see song play next to bushi as keita did previous years.it wouldnt surprise me.who whould sucrifice?depends on the game ,what we need etc.Again, who would you sacrifice in favor of playing the double pivot with Song? Not worth it. Especially because 1) we never start with a double-pivot, and it would be suicidal to go experiment with it now in the CL semis, and 2) it would mean we are adapting our game to Bayern's, which is a way of subordinating from the start and letting Bayern control the game. We need to go out with our standard XI and just do the best we can, like in the 2nd leg VS Milan. That works better for us than the best double-pivot there is.
One of my friends who is a long time cule, Told me that the last time Barcelona used an actual double pivot was 17 years ago.with 'Sir Bobby Robson' (I can't verify this for sure)
So you can all forget about the double pivot.
We do play with both of them sometimes now, as well, but only late in the second half when we're leading. And that's a good strategy, IMHO. I wouldn't want us starting with a double-pivot, though.
It's simply not our style, Too conservative.We do play with both of them sometimes now, as well, but only late in the second half when we're leading. And that's a good strategy, IMHO. I wouldn't want us starting with a double-pivot, though.
Using a double pivot to maintain a result is completely different than using it as your main system.We used it a few weeks ago, don't remember against who but we brought on Busi who proceeded to give the ball away for a goal.
I'd say that's the way to go. Not as the starting lineup but a possible strategy to keep a lead.
Last time we used this, it had the exact opposite result as we conceded against Celta.
3 starts for Song, 3 clean sheets for the team.